ZellMorrowsPledge said: "Dave13 said: "I saw GHD, I saw it. I enjoyed it, but I certainly didn't love it. Certainly liked DEH and CFA much more than GHD. For me, I didn't like Phil being such an a**hole. Then when he softened up, but I was just not buying it. It felt like an "act", and to me he was still an a** at the end.
I did see the movie, so I know the character. I certainly enjoyed Bill Murray's version much more. "
Interesting, I couldnt disagree more. Andy Karl takes the audience on a two and a half hour journey and by the end I couldnt help but root for and believe in Phil's transformation. Especially during the Night Will Come scene, thats when things starting to switch in Phil's head and his way of thinking started to change."
I agree with Zell. Particularly, since Andy Karl has an inherent likability to him, that Bill Murray doesn't, he really has to lay on the jerk to show Phil's transformation. (Of course as a fan of Andy, I'll admit I might just be projecting.)
Another reason I prefer Andy's take is that the musical allows him to go much deeper into just how much being stuck in the time loop is affecting Phil, so the payoff at the end is greater. It's been awhile since I've seen the movie, but I don't remember movie Phil showing as much despair as musical Phil does when he's telling Rita about being stuck. Or if he does, I feel like movie plays it for laughs, where the musical keeps the sadness, even though the scene gets laughs.
I feel the opposite way Dave, in that, while I love the movie and Bill's interpretation, his Phil seems less genuinely changed at the end than Andy's. But I've also seen more of Bill's work, so I might just be conflating all his roles together, altering my perception of his Phil. Anyway, I like both the movie and the musical, am just more taken with the musical right now obviously.
Updated On: 6/13/17 at 11:41 PM