It may be that Moonlight stands the test of time a lot better than La La Land. I've wondered that myself.
That has never been an indicating factor of Best Picture. Popularity and endurance have little to do with what is considered "best" by a panel of voters on the day they voted. Wizard of Oz, Citizen Kane, It's a Wonderful Life, The Ten Commandments, How the West Was Won, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, The Graduate, Fiddler on the Roof, Star Wars, Apocalypse Now, Raiders of the Lost Ark, E.T., The Color Purple, Working Girl, Ghost, Beauty and the Beast, Fargo, The Sixth Sense, Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring, Brokeback Mountain, Avatar, Black Swan, Les Miserables...just a few examples of nominees that have arguably endured better than the respective Best Picture winners.
Last night's outcome was unexpected. I was speculating about the reasons why that might have happened. If you disagree, that's fine. But if you want to fall back on the wisdom of Academy voters, we can go through their sorry history of picking the best films of the year.
It's just the same sort of conspiracy theories we get every year when someone's personal fave didn't win. Their "sorry history" is a record of the majority opinion of the voters at a specific moment in time, not a record of your personal opinion at any given moment in time.
Considering that "best film" is completely a matter of opinion, then yes, the Academy Award always goes to the best film, according to their subjective joint opinion.
Exactly.
She said the "Arrtist" so I thought that is all the Arts. but my friend who is a nurse and helps people live every day,found that statement ridiculous and self centered.
Then you and your "friend" apparently didn't listen to what she had to say and took that one sentence out of context.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 2/27/17 at 12:45 PM