Election 2024- Page 19

[ACL2006]

Posted: 8/6/24 at 8:09pm

 

[ACL2006]

Posted: 8/6/24 at 8:17pm

Walz doesn't use teleprompters which is amazing considering how well he speaks. He'll destroy Vance in a debate.

[Highland Guy]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 8:26am

The Harris campaign has raised another $20M since Walz joined the team.  Let's see those numbers rise.

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 10:27am

kdogg36 said: "TheatreFan4 said: "Her husband is literally Jewish..."

To be fair, Trump is married to an immigrant and Vance to a woman of color, despite their obvious contempt for the groups their wives belong to.

Of course, the above-mentioned "rumor" is right-wing nonsense for independent reasons."

kdogg attempted to demonstrate he is capable of reason.  But he couldn't do it as he resorted to the repeated weak accusation strategy so many recklessly spew.  Once again, hypocrisy raises its ugly head.  He and so many like-minded believe reckless accusations, without solid evidence flung from the right are nonsensical, hate-filled and plain dumb, but reckless accusations, without solid evidence flung from the left are somehow "obvious truth".  They are like trained puppies and incapable of reasoning for themselves.

This is true of so many on the right as well.  I recognize that.  Many of you believe the same of me, but you can't back that belief up.  I've commented plenty, so if the evidence existed someone would quote it and shove it in my face.  Instead of doing what most any sensible person would, they take the cowards way out and resort to name-calling and say "you're not worth my time".  Laughable and pitiful.

I too look forward to the debates and hope more are scheduled.  Instead of name-calling being the only content, governing methodologies may actually get some attention.  And I hope independents in the swing states make up the highest viewership.

[ErikJ972]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 12:29pm

Pauly3 said: "kdogg36 said: "TheatreFan4 said: "Her husband is literally Jewish..."

To be fair, Trump is married to an immigrant and Vance to a woman of color, despite their obvious contempt for the groups their wives belong to.

Of course, the above-mentioned "rumor" is right-wing nonsense for independent reasons."

kdogg attempted to demonstrate he is capable of reason. But he couldn't do it as he resorted to the repeated weak accusation strategy so many recklessly spew. Once again, hypocrisy raises its ugly head. He and so many like-minded believe reckless accusations, without solid evidence flung from the right are nonsensical, hate-filled and plain dumb, but reckless accusations, without solid evidence flung from the left are somehow "obvious truth". They are like trained puppies and incapable of reasoning for themselves.

This is true of so many on the right as well. I recognize that. Many of you believe the same of me, but you can't back that belief up. I've commented plenty, so if the evidence existed someone would quote it and shove it in my face. Instead of doing what most any sensible person would, they take the cowards way out and resort to name-calling and say "you're not worth my time". Laughable and pitiful.

I too look forward to the debates and hope more are scheduled. Instead of name-calling being the only content, governing methodologies may actually get some attention. And I hope independents in the swing states make up the highest viewership."

You support a man that called Nazis good people. And who led an insurrection against the country. That's all we need to know.

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 1:33pm

ErikJ972 said: "You support a man that called Nazis good people. And who led an insurrection against the country. That's all we need to know."

Trump did not call Nazis good people, nor did he lead an insurrection.  There is plenty to accuse Trump of that has some merit, so why do you and so many others distort the truth and/or lie about it?

[TheatreFan4]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 3:23pm

Pauly3 said: "ErikJ972 said: "You support a man that called Nazis good people. And who led an insurrection against the country. That's all we need to know."

Trump did not call Nazis good people, nor did he lead an insurrection. There is plenty to accuse Trump of that has some merit, so why do you and so many others distort the truth and/or lie about it?"

Literally gassed people up and send them towards the Capitol. When asked by Kevin McCarthy to tell them to go home was responded to with "Well Kevin, they seem far more concerned about this election than you are...", didn't call them off for several hours well after they entered the building. Had states multiple times that he would pardon those who committed the crimes. So what exactly do you call that if not leading? You'd have to own up to enabled it, supported it, wanted it to happen...

[ACL2006]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 3:23pm

Pauly3 said: "ErikJ972 said: "You support a man that called Nazis good people. And who led an insurrection against the country. That's all we need to know."

Trump did not call Nazis good people, nor did he lead an insurrection. There is plenty to accuse Trump of that has some merit, so why do you and so many others distort the truth and/or lie about it?"

He's definitely called white supremacy groups "good people" and he most definitely lead that insurrection.

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 3:59pm

Neither of you contradicted what I said.  There's plenty to criticize of Trump.  We may agree on some of it.

I am unaware of Trump calling white supremacy groups good people.  But should you care to point to an example that can be reviewed, I will take a look at it.

Telling people to go to the Capital and peacefully and patriotically protest is not "gassing them up" in any negative way and certainly not inspiration for an insurrection (as much as you and others constantly assert and would like it to mean).  Trump should have spoken up long before he did and more forcefully too.  I understand the criticism of Trump and join in on some of it. But an insurrection, which is the crime asserted, didn't occur.

[Highland Guy]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 4:02pm

While Walz was speaking at the Wisconsin rally that just concluded, apparently one of the people in the audience near the stage was overcome by the heat.  The rally stopped for a number of minutes while the person was tended to (not shown on camera, and rightly so).  And during those moments, our next Vice President exhibited his concern and compassion and humanity.  He is a true gentleman.  Kamala Harris made the right choice for all of us.

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 5:36pm

I like Walz, I do, but I find it troubling that Buttigieg was ruled out just for being gay. Since when is it okay to cave in to bigotry? I want my POTUS to lead by example. Not leave an MVP sitting on the bench because a group of deplorables don't like him. Sad. Hiilary Clinton was also afraid of the conservatives, she felt she had used up all their goodwill by her just being a woman so picked the blandest whitest VP candidate she could find. It didn't go well. At least this is an upgrade in Tims.

[TheatreFan4]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 6:42pm

Pauly3 said: "Telling people to go to the Capital and peacefully and patriotically protest is not "gassing them up" in any negative way and certainly not inspiration for an insurrection (as much as you and others constantly assert and would like it to mean). Trump should have spoken up long before he did and more forcefully too. I understand the criticism of Trump and join in on some of it. But an insurrection, which is the crime asserted, didn't occur."

He and many of his speakers used very violent language to inspire his audience, what unfolded was exactly what he intended he just didn't get the resolution he had hoped for in the end. Don't play dumb when we have footage of him watching it unfold and what he told congressional leadership when they asked for him to tell them to stand down, it just makes you look very unintelligent when I know you're just an asshole instead.

 

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 7:30pm

TheatreFan4 said: "He and many of his speakers used very violent language to inspire his audience, what unfolded was exactly what he intended he just didn't get the resolution he had hoped for in the end. Don't play dumb when we have footage of him watching it unfold and what he told congressional leadership when they asked for him to tell them to stand down, it just makes you look very unintelligent when I know you're just an asshole instead."

There is zero credible evidence Trump intended for people to overpower police and break into the Capital.  Trump's language and actions before and after are worthy of much criticism (we agree on some of it), but you and others are playing dumb (at best) when you suggest Trump intended exactly what unfolded. You do what I accuse so many of you do and stretch the truth, or worse, fabricate a narrative that trained puppies are all too willing to believe and then repeatedly re-assert.

[Highland Guy]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 7:52pm

The MAGA crowd can stomp their feet and hold their breath until they turn MAGA red, but they had their chance and they f****d it up.  These trolls need to understand that......

WE ARE NOT GOING BACK  !!

Updated On: 8/7/24 at 07:52 PM

[TheatreFan4]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 8:03pm

Pauly3 said: "There is zero credible evidence Trump intended for people to overpower police and break into the Capital. Trump's language and actions before and after are worthy of much criticism (we agree on some of it), but you and others are playing dumb (at best) when you suggest Trump intended exactly what unfolded. You do what I accuse so many of you do and stretch the truth, or worse, fabricate a narrative that trained puppies are all too willing to believe and then repeatedly re-assert."

Listen, I'm not listening to your patronizing whiny ****. He was asserting that the election was stolen from him, that if he wasn't awarded the presidency that they would not have a country. Spent weeks pressuring his VP to violate the law including that hour speech. He was leveraging for violence, his sole use of the word "peacefully" in that speech does not change that. What goes to his intent is his SILENCE when it did get violent as he watched and ACTIVELY  refused to do anything. 

You keep saying he's worthy of much criticism, but exactly what part? You seem to think that saying "peacefully" once is enough to exonerate him on his intent. Are you voting for him this year?

[South Florida]

Posted: 8/7/24 at 8:52pm

You guys know idiots thrive on your outrage.

[Broadway Flash]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 3:16am

Cori Bush and Jamal Bowman got primaried!  Yes!!

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 2:19pm

TheatreFan4 said: "Pauly3 said: "There is zero credible evidence Trump intended for people to overpower police and break into the Capital. Trump's language and actions before and after are worthy of much criticism (we agree on some of it), but you and others are playing dumb (at best) when you suggest Trump intended exactly what unfolded. You do what I accuse so many of you do and stretch the truth, or worse, fabricate a narrative that trained puppies are all too willing to believe and then repeatedly re-assert."

Listen, I'm not listening to your patronizing whiny ****. He was asserting that the election was stolen from him, that if he wasn't awarded the presidency that they would not have a country. Spent weeks pressuring his VP to violate the law including that hour speech. He was leveraging for violence, his sole use of the word "peacefully" in that speech does not change that. What goes to his intent is his SILENCE when it did get violent as he watched and ACTIVELY refused to do anything.

You keep saying he's worthy of much criticism, but exactly what part? You seem to think that saying "peacefully" once is enough to exonerate him on his intent. Are you voting for him this year?"

 

I stated Trump did not lead an insurrection, and you attempted to rebut what I stated.  I never said Trump didn't behave poorly or recklessly or abhorrently.  You are the one whining.  You, like so many others, can't stick to the actual argument made.  And then you think I'm the whiny one or the dumb one or the racist or whatever garbage enters your puppy-like brains.

I will be voting for Trump, not because I like him.  I like what Democrats are offering less.

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 2:26pm

Highland Guy said: "The MAGA crowd can stomp their feet and hold their breath until they turn MAGA red, but they had their chance and they f****d it up. These trolls need to understand that......

WE ARE NOT GOING BACK !!"

 

South Florida said: "You guys know idiots thrive on your outrage."

 

That you both can't see what is so obviously staring back at you in the mirror is stunning!

[Highland Guy]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 3:10pm

Happy "International Cat Day" to Tim Walz, kitty enthusiast and soon-to-be Vice President of the United States !!

https://icatcare.org/international-cat-day/

Updated On: 8/8/24 at 03:10 PM

[Highland Guy]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 4:31pm

And I should clarify for the resident BWW MAGA Trolls that "International Cat Day" is NOT designed to honor the previous CONVICTED FELON and SEXUAL ABUSER  who will forever be known for "You can do anything.  Just grab 'em by the "P***Y*.  Light years apart.  If our resident MAGA trolls don't understand the difference, they should discuss it with an adult.

Updated On: 8/8/24 at 04:31 PM

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 5:37pm

Highland Guy, you do FAR more trolling than anyone you oppose.  You're a trained puppy cheerleader.  And a hypocrite.  And not the least bit clever.

Pithy?

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 6:09pm

Pauly is not racist. He just enables a racist hatemonger. Not the same thing. C'mon, guys.

[MysteriousLady]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 6:56pm

Pauly3 said: "Highland Guy, you do FAR more trolling than anyone you oppose. You're a trained puppy cheerleader. And a hypocrite. And not the least bit clever.

Pithy?"

You constantly insult everyone you interact with. I don't dislike you because you are a conservative; you just aren't very bright and you are mean to everyone for some reason. 

[Pauly3]

Posted: 8/8/24 at 7:23pm

Jay Lerner-Z said: "Pauly is not racist. He just enables a racist hatemonger. Not the same thing. C'mon, guys."

I have explained, multiple times, I am not a Trump fan.  But his stance on policies more so align with mine than do Harris (or Biden before her).  Not just a little, but a lot.  Why is this so difficult to comprehend?  I know why.  It's called "Trump Derangement Syndrome", and it causes people to not be able to think straight.