CZJ is sure a beauty, but why is she sitting on the floor? $140.00 bux a ticket and they're sitting on the floor? I wonder how she ever agreed to that?
It is theatre and she is an actress. Sometimes the charcaters in a play actually do sit on the floor. You may not like the scale of the production but your comment is nonsensical. You obviously don't have much idea of the earthy nature of Desiree -I am sure she is quite at home of the floor. I can just hear CZJ say no I am going to turn down a great part in a terrific show because they are going to ask me to sit on the floor!
She turned down the role of Claudia in Nine because she thought it was too small (and Maury Yeston wouldn't write another song for her). I happen to think that was a rather bad move.
When I see the phrase "the ____ estate", I imagine a vast mansion in the country full of monocled men and high-collared women receiving letters about productions across the country and doing spit-takes at whatever they contain.
-Kad
"but why is she sitting on the floor? $140.00 bux a ticket and they're sitting on the floor? I wonder how she ever agreed to that?"
It does not seem you are familiar with the show. That is the opening of act 2 when the guests arrive, and Madame Armfeldt announces "we cannot be caught squatting on the ground like bohemians!" They are supposed to be on the ground.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
I am going to be over there early on Tuesday morning anyway. I will see how the line is and ask the box office about the rush policy. I will report back Tuesday afternoon.
"Half-light can be forgiving—to the aging, to the vain, to the furtive philanderer—but in Trevor Nunn’s stunning, twilit, devastatingly good new production of A Little Night Music, it’s as punishing as the equatorial sun."
I can't help but feel that the better the reviews are for this, the more bare-bones/big-star revivals we will see in the future for more adult shows like ALNM, for better and worse.
I'm very confused with this review. It seems all over the place and I can't tell if it is good or not. I don't even think Brantley knew if he liked it or not from the feel of that article.
"It's about the Benjamins, not the Bernsteins."-CapnHook
I don't know how to classify it but it almost looks negative - unfavourable towards most of the cast and not much at all (anything?) good about the physical production itself.
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
It's mixed to negative, with a rave for Lansbury and a positive notice for Lazar. I have a feeling this has more to do with the show than the production itself.