Yes, essentially everything moves from THIS - the whole section rotates clockwise around the stage and behind it.
To THIS
It happens at the beginning of Act Two (the Ball). In terms of what takes place on stage, a lot of ball dancing with sweeping melodies, the prince trying to find a bride - eventually dancing with the 'transformed' Cinderella who now has blonde hair, makeup and a ravishing dress (as opposed to her emo outfit). The prince doesn't recognise her and when she says that she has always loved him he kind of mocks and dismisses her as ridiculous because she thinks she is just one of the other girls trying to get with him who doesn't know him, and says he is 'waiting for someone' (i.e. the real Cinderella). Then Carrie Hope does one of her big ballads ("I Know I have a heart" on an empty stage but now in the round so the blocking involves kind of changing position occasionally so everyone gets a piece of the song, and then the Prince also has a lit bit of a meltdown in song, which I enjoyed although need the cast recording to really remember it. If I recall it is at this moment the chairs start coming back. The effect of this whole thing is essentially making the theatre more seem more intimate. I liked it but I wouldn't describe it as necessary. Very curious if it transfers to Broadway if they will want to invest in making this happen - maybe it's not necessary but this is essentially the Chandelier or Helicopter of the show so maybe they think it's worth it just for the word of mouth.
For those that are interested, ALW appeared to sit at the end of row I or J so he did not appear to opt for going to 'the ball'.
Give me claws and a hunch, just away from this bunch.
There is a slipper but I’d say it’s more a cameo than a real plot point. The whole plot ‘twist’ is that the prince doesn’t want the transformed Cinderella at all so the original plot point of searching for her throughout the kingdom by the slipper doesn’t really exist anymore. The whole you need to get back by 12am thing is also said but it’s actually unclear what happens after the time (nothing really). Could use more clarity here in my opinion.
Give me claws and a hunch, just away from this bunch.
Oh man, I loved this. I’m beat from a full day so just quick thoughts. The show is definitely not what I thought it would be AT ALL. I knew it was a “new take” on the story and some of the wording made it seem it was going to be very “Girl power, I’m independent, I don’t need a man to be happy, etc” which is not at all what this is. This new Cinderella is still very much seeking love and it’s very nice to see that mixed in with the way this character, who IS much more independent and fleshed out is written, especially when played by someone as extraordinary as Carrie.
That said, the book does have a few issues that at this point will just be there forever - I call them Hallmark movie problems. You know how in a Hallmark movie, the girl sees the guy she likes talking to a girl, who’s probably his sister or something and she decides that he’s in love with her and just runs away and then he has to find her and go through an hour of making up, when all she had to do was say “Yo who was that chick?” and it would all be cleared up. But I enjoyed the show so much, I can forgive things like that.
The score is definitely stronger than ”School of Rock” and gives room for Webber to do what he does best with his soaring melodies. It’s definitely one I’ll be listening to a lot.
Other cast members that I adored were Victoria Hamilton as the Stepmother. Holy crap, SHES brilliant and hilarious. She has this one number with the Queen that’s just two bitchy middle aged women being shady and bitchy to each other that I GUARANTEE is gonna be done by every pair of actresses over 40 in concerts. Just hilarious. Also, Gloria Onitiri as the “Godmother” was great but very underused. Not sure what else she could really do but she’s so bizarre that I just wanted MORE MORE MORE of her. The transformation scene is something out of “American Psycho” and made me so so happy to just see something that out of the box.
Now then, the bit with the Prince at the end and the wedding (not sure if it’s been “spoiled” already) could have been gimmicky and absurd, but I found it really beautiful especially sitting in a theater surrounded by little kids cheering it on. Really brought a tear or three to my eye.
I’m definitely going to go back and see it again in a couple days. Good on Webber and all for creating something brand new crowd pleasing. It’s just what we need at this time.
Forgot to add, there were some parents there I saw after the show who were a bit shocked that they had just taken their little kids to see this show that really isn’t aimed at kids AT ALL. Maybe the marketing needs to change a bit to even feature the three or four HUNKS (I was so focused on one of them I lost count) who heat up the stage half naked for most of the show. I want a show of just them.
When this does eventually come to Broadway, Donna Murphy MUST play the Queen. My dream has always been to see her play Queen Aggravain and I think this is as close as I’ll get to that happening. And Rachel York 100% has to play the Stepmother.
She is still very much called Victoria Hamilton-Barritt.
Judging by what I’ve heard about this show so far, this won’t be troubling Broadway anytime soon. Sounds like a confused mess and I cannot wait to see it before ALW shuts it down to ‘revise’ it!
Jordan Catalano said: "Forgot to add, there were some parents there I saw after the show who were a bit shocked that they had just taken their little kids to see this show that really isn’t aimed at kids AT ALL. Maybe the marketing needs to change a bit to even feature the three or four HUNKS (I was so focused on one of them I lost count) who heat up the stage half naked for most of the show. I want a show of just them."
Tell us more about these guys, please!
==> this board is a nest of vipers <==
"Michael Riedel...The Perez Hilton of the New York Theatre scene" - Craig Hepworth, What's On Stage
Yes, them! The one in the middle is my favorite. I went back again today to see the understudy for the Prince and thought he was fabulous and really enjoyed the show overall, again.
Does it feel “cheap?” I thought School of Rock’s design felt very lush. And some of these pictures look cheap but then the seats revolving sounds so cool. Just curious.
SouthernCakes said: "I’m not sure how’d they pull this off in a Broadway house. But a similar thing happened in the original Cats on Broadway, right? So it is possible! "
No, the Winter Garden stage wasn't a rotating one like the West End's Cats.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
^They’re all ensemble and also (I suppose) members of the Royal Court and basically just hot and examples of how everyone in the village is “perfect”. The middle one is also the Baker and I love him. They’re onstage a lot during the show and have a whole number where they workout and fence and just show off. ALW is obviously targeting the kids and the gays with this show.