willrolandsframes said: "Literally just two to three years ago, only about 10 shows were hitting the million mark. Thus, this caused a higher turnover in shows, allowing theatregoers more opportunities to see new productions. However, if all of these open-ended shows are continuing to succeed financially, then how are we going to get a wider variety of new shows? It feels like normally by this time of year, we tend to at least have a grasp of what our spring season might look like. But right now, all of these questionable transfer shows (Moulin Rouge, Hadestown, Beetlejuice, etc.) can't come if they don't have a theatre. And right now, none of the 19 shows that are open-ended are anywhere near closing, and really only 3-5 of the open-ended shows that are under the million mark have any remote chance of closing by the end of the year.
My point is that I'm concerned about the lack of new productions coming to Broadway, and I feel like the only way to increase this number is to increase the turnover among current shows, which cannot really happen if 19 of 32 shows are grossing 7 figures.
But, again, perhaps this is a non-issue. I'm just a fan of seeing more fresh and new content on the Great White Way, and I don't know when we're really going to see a year filled with that again."
So you're rooting for wildly successful shows to fail just so something new can come in? If you ran a company and had a great employee who had been there 5 years, would you fire him or her just to bring in a new employee who may or may not work out? "But that's a business, this is the ARTS." No, it's show business and as the famous saying goes, without the business, there is no show. We've had some original, well thought of works the past few years that didn't run as long as people would have hoped... Bandstand, Indecent, Sweat, A Doll's House, to name 4. Do you have ticket stubs from all of them? Some of them? Any of them? If you went to see all of them or even most of them, great! But if you didn't, then you're not supporting new original works and if a strong advocate for them isn't, why should producers take a risk and bring more of them to Broadway?
As JBroadway mentioned, there are plenty of great new works getting loads of exposure off-Broadway. The best, most commercially viable of them transfer but the rest are still being seen, able to attract an audience who have the chance to see a great new work. You have access to them, are able to enjoy them in a more intimate setting at a more attractive price point and there remains plenty of motivation for the very best playwrights to continue to create new works."But they're not On Broadway." So what?
Updated On: 7/30/18 at 04:41 PM