Kad said: "And this is the approach that has long been embraced in staging classic plays. It’s extremely rare to see Shakespeare or Sophocles staged in their literal settings, even as their texts frequently refer to them."
I'm completely on board with this, and also your observation that, "That’s what makes the revival work", but I have to admit - I don't know what obscured themes were actually "obscured", or are now brought to light by being presented in the setting of Ball culture.
The biggest difference for me is that in your example of Shakespeare, bringing the text into a contemporary setting (or any other), usually points up the relevance of the text - that it's not only still "alive" and holds true, but also is applicable in multiple settings.
I'm not so sure I can agree that also applies to "Cats" and "...Jellicle Ball". The original production seemed to me to be about bringing the poetry of T.S Elliott to life. In this new production, the focus is more about recognizing/lifting up Ball culture.
To my eyes, it's a Ball that happens to have a T.S. Elliot theme - a theme that could easily be swapped out for any other and still work as successfully as "...Jellicle Ball" - there's not much tying the libretto to the setting or characters who don't appear to be cats, but instead, are "cat-themed".
Updated On: 7/8/26 at 09:30 AM