No "firing away," henrik.
My affection for the Dolly film was an acquired one. It was not "love at first sight."
I initially couldn't see or embrace the "overblown, affected charm" of the movie.
I now see it as a highly stylized "painting" of that era. There is nothing realistic about it. It's a surrealistic reflection of that era (that never was).
I really love the movie now, including Streisand's performance, especially in her scenes with Matthau, and any time she sings. The staging, direction, locations, costumes, all first-rate.
It's like eating a bowl of brightly-colored sherbet. If you're not in the mood for that, or if you like less sweet desserts, then by all means avoid it. But if you're in the mood, especially as a "summer escape" movie, it's definitely one of my favorites now.
As for Phantom ...
Idk, I thought Gerald looked young enough to be her suitor. ... and therein lies my entire problem with what Webber's Phantom has become. He's not supposed to be "her suitor," he is a monster! It's a horror story. He should be older, ugly, and frightening. There should be nothing that doesn't make us recoil from him to look at or think about. That's the way Michael Crawford approached it.
The "love story" happens because we understand the monster's torment, not because we secretly think he's "hot." Good god. I really can't stand the way the part is now cast. It ruins it for me, and it completely weakens the story and turns Christine (and the audience) into a bunch of helpless fangirls. This is a "beauty and the beast" story, not a "beauty and the hot, misunderstood outcast" story.
I hate that so much.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22