Posted: 3/3/20 at 2:34pm
A number of people have commented on the poor book,
I saw Company 3 times when it first opened in 1970. I have seen it at least 8-10 times times since then. There has never been a single time when I didn't cringe multiple times during the book scenes, sometimes uncomfortably because some of them were just so forced or, eventually, forced AND dated. IMO George Furth was a hack, and every production I have seen would have been much better if the book had been thrown out and redone from scratch. I have always wondered why Hal Prince didn't try to make it seem less episodic, e.g., now is the scene with the pot smokers, now is the scene with the scared bride-to-be, etc.
That said, I have always felt the best way to view Company is simply to endure the book scenes and wait for the next musical number, since they are all so damned entertaining. By preparing myself for the fact that the book sucks, I find that I enjoy it more. Based on what I have read here, I am expecting that I will have to cringe more during some of the scenes, are pot smokers in 2000 remotely funny?
Two last points: I am among the group people who hated Raul Esparza in the role. I thought that he was so cold that no-one would want to be his friend. His Being Alive was sung beautifully, however. I saw Boyd Gaines twice, once when he was having vocal issues early in the run (just as BP had early in the run of Gypsy), and once when his voice was better. I thought his performance was excellent, especially his Being Alive. He had a likability that made his aloneness all the more hard to observe.
In either version, the book still kept (and has always kept) Company from being a truly great musical, even though I have loved most versionsI have seen to date.
