Cursed Child... right or wrong to support?

I say wrong.

How much money does JK Rowling make from this, and what does she do with it? Who and what does she support?

Every young mind brought to this play is introduced to this woman, and she is given influence over them.

I'm sorry BroadwayWorld, I don't want to see the latest trailer for this show, and I believe you should stop supporting it. The sooner it closes the better. I believe the larger issue of trans lives is more important than giving these actors and crew work, great as that may be.

Has anyone considered becoming a Larry Kramer at the door as the crowds come out, passing out trans supportive literature?

I understand the struggle. After much thought, I have still decided to read/watch/attend anything HP that I want to.

In this particular case, “Harry Potter” – and all it represents – feels much bigger than its creator. While I don’t support or agree with Rowling, I don’t see her closed mind represented in her art. In fact, her art often promotes love, acceptance, understanding, etc. Harry Potter has (and continues to) make children excited about books (and perhaps the play is making children excited about theatre) and I think the good that has come out of the Harry Potter stories outweighs the bigotry of one woman.

And, in terms of supporting her financially, she is at a level that she is so rich it wouldn’t matter if she didn’t make one more cent in her life. However, the entire Harry Potter brand is giving jobs to (at least) thousands of people between “Cursed Child,” the theme parks, the movies, the stores, etc.

I also found Daniel Radcliffe’s statement about JK Rowling/Harry Potter very insightful: https://www.thetrevorproject.org/blog/daniel-radcliffe-responds-to-j-k-rowlings-tweets-on-gender-identity/

I draw my line when the art itself is promoting some form of hate/negativity, when consuming some sort of art/product has a significant impact on the person or business’ success, or when it’s something like MJ the Musical – where the show is celebrating the person-in-question.

I believe we are at a point in society where we should enjoy whatever makes us happy and fu*k those who say no. I am not watching anything else Harry Potter related that might come out, but I love the play. I grew up with the books. I do not follow JK Rowling on any social media platform. I will not accept her personally, but I will read/watch things that bring me joy.

If someone really wants to have a positive impact on the lives of those who are transgender, protesting or avoiding the Cursed Child doesn't seem like it would have much effect. But for those who may believe any support, financial or otherwise, is problematic in an instance like this, they obviously can act consistent with that core value.

Jay Lerner-Z said: "Jason... but can I judge BroadwayWorld for enabling it? I don't know if they get paid for putting up these trailers or what. I believe a moral stance could easily be taken here. Like when Playbill left Twitter and detailed why."

I saw the trailer but didn't watch it. Don't support JK Rowling or Harry Potter? Just keep scrolling. You worry about yourself, and others will do the same. Just because they support the show doesn't make them transphobic.

Jay Lerner-Z said: ""You just worry about yourself"

Too many people already do that. People only worrying about themselves is why the world is so fcked.

If I believe harm is being done, it's hard to just keep scrolling."

You're clearly passionate on this topic, but I perceive your replies here as expecting others to share what seems like your absolute moral conviction about what to do.

That's fine for yourself, but many decisions in life come to choosing between competing values, and as the comments reflect here, others do not share your absolutism and would advance decisions aligned with other values that matter to them.

No human being has unlimited compassion despite the tremendous needs the current world presents to us. We each have to decide when, how, and where to invest our psychological energy and financial resources to bring about change that matters to us.

And in response to your question in message #10, you can certainly judge BroadwayWorld if you see them as enablers, but remember you started a thread which is generating traffic that helps BWW attract advertisers and earn revenue, so you're mildly complicit in an enterprise you're questioning.

Great show and enough said. The OP will find an issue with almost anything. So far on these boards he has denounced Beyonce for where she has concert, says conservatives are the reason producers will not have male couple on "Dancing with The Stars" and now a great show like "Curse Child" needs to close. Newsflash to OP - sometimes the people who create entertainment or perform for us are not always model citizens. They have flaws just like you and me and because they may have views you don't like does not mean their work should not be supported. Nobody is forcing anyone to go to this show so you can vote with your pocketbook regarding your feelings about JK Rowlings. Just curious, should Roman Polanski or Woody Allen films be supported? Should Michael Jackson have had a Broadway musical about him and had his records sold?

I had tickets to Cursed Child in San Francisco pre-Covid shutdown. In the intervening time, Rowling double-downed on her transphobia, and I've since decided I no longer want to see/read anything related to Harry Potter. Rowling killed the magic for me.



That being said, I don't find it personally useful to get in fights with strangers about it. If someone asks why I'm skipping it I'm happy to discuss, but I don't find it the best use of my time or mental energy to pick fights over it.

I'm not picking fights, I just find it hard to sit back and shrug. How can I combat the harm this person is doing? By being active.

Pauly, not all opinions are worthy of respect. Especially not where harm is being done. Opinions like JKR's pose a serious threat, and we can't just gloss over that.

Zeppie, I did not complain about where Beyoncé does her concerts. She did not do a concert in Dubai, she was highly paid to promote a resort for elites in a place where being gay is illegal. I just challenged her utter shameless hypocrisy doing this so soon after accepting a GLAAD award and piggybacking off the LGBT community on her latest album. As I have explained numerous times to you already.

Jay Lerner-Z said: "Also, very importantly...

Every time a trans person sees a trailer pop up for this show it's like a banner flashing up that says "YOU DON'T MATTER"..."

Although I empathize, and can understand why a trans person might feel this way, in my opinion that is a pretty big leap that probably has more to do with that individual than with BWW or J.K. Rowling. It’s a play about wizards.

Also, Rowling is entitled to her opinion. She’s not anti-trans, she has issues with conflating people who have female bodies and people who have female identities. Granted, she really should have STFU about it rather than doubled down, but no, I don’t think it is “doing harm” to buy a ticket to the play (which technically she did not actually write - Jack Thorne wrote it).

JK Rowling absolutely is anti-trans and to pretend she isn't is.....shameful.



I agree with OP that spending money to support this show is wrong. Deny it all you want, but you're lining her pockets and keeping her works relevant. I was a massive HP fan growing up and I didn't see the last Fantastic Beasts movie or purchase that video game earlier this year. As a NB gay person I do not feel comfortable knowing my money is going to her and I side-eye people who play it off like it's no big deal.



All that being said keep Beyonce out of your damn mouth

QueenTwinnied, I understand why you feel that way. And you are completely within your rights to not want to have anything to do with her and her work (I never got into the Harry Potter craze, personally, and have no desire to see the play myself).