Posted: 3/28/23 at 1:59am
Reading through all of the reviews is fascinating because many critics identify problems, or things they didn’t like, about the revival. But they just didn’t agree on what they were and thought the revival was good overall. That’s not dissimilar to some of the mixed responses on this thread, except for the people who were very disappointed. (Full disclosure: I liked the revival and would recommend it, but I did think it was flawed.)
Some factors (and I’m just spitballing here so nobody should take the following too seriously):
- Critics get good seats. I noticed that commenters with better seats liked the revival more. Not everyone, but I thought there might be a pattern. There was more praise for the orchestra and less criticism of Annaleigh Ashford’s occasional difficulty being understood, for example.
- No one wants to trash a Sweeney Todd revival. It’s a great musical and a big event, what with the much-hyped full orchestra and big-name talent involved, and the audience was electric. There was one outright pan (in Bloomberg). There were a few mixed reviews, but even those critics found plenty to highlight. Variety’s review was a love letter to Ashford and her gifts for physical comedy. Most reviews praised Josh Groban’s singing.
- Critics aren’t necessarily purists, and even if they are, know they are writing for a general audience. Peter Marks of the Washington Post, like many critics, is a big Sondheim admirer. But I thought he pulled his punches a bit. After grumbling about the difficulty of understanding some of Sondheim’s lyrics, he wrote it off as a sound design problem that will be fixed, or just an audience enthusiasm problem. Maybe it can’t be fixed, as someone suggested in another thread, because the sound designers have done all they can.
- We’re all just too picky. Ashford’s lengthy floor spins were a problem for me in ‘A Little Priest, not just because they distracted from Sondheim’s wordplay, which is supposed to build in hilarity, one job title after another, but because the song is so important to the story. Everything has to stop for too much physical comedy, including the orchestra. Ashford isn’t freelancing. This is director Thomas Kail’s choice. But by the very end of the song, Kail and the choreographer and the orchestra end it all with a terrific flourish and the audience explodes. Maybe you can’t screw that song up, even if I didn’t like some of the choices along the way. Same with the entire revival.
Updated On: 3/28/23 at 01:59 AM