#151
Posted: 6/9/14 at 1:15pm
**Some Spoilers**
I found the show disappointing too. I had high hopes for it. There's lots of good material there and I loved most of the music and most of the cast, but I had two real problems with it.
First, the haphazard flow of energy and narrative drive. The book writer and director just let the tension flag too often. Whenever a number or plot point would gain momentum, the air would suddenly be let out of it, either with a poor finish to a number, or by an overlong, meandering, or poorly-placed book scene.
The second big problem for me was the lead character's performance—an inexcusable flaw in any show. Saul Williams may be a star of the slam poetry world, but he is not an engaging actor, advanced acting degree notwithstanding. There was no trace of sexuality in his portrayal of John. The character has just been released from years in prison, and to be sure, he's repressing his passion for the woman he lost to another man while locked up, but you need to see and feel that passion anyway—that sexual heat. The scenes between John and Corinne should smoulder once she breaks through the wall he's built, but they are cold. I also couldn't understand much of his rapping. At first I blamed the sound design, but later realized I could hear every lyric from all the other actors.
I can't help comparing him with Chad Boseman from the workshop, who oozed sex and longing despite his post-prison feelings of isolation. Boseman's powerful performance anchored John as the true heart of the show. He was superb. I look forward to seeing him in the film Get On Up, as James Brown in August. GetOnUpMovie.com
I think the lead character in this show deserves/needs at least one sung solo song that shows more than just his anger. One would think there might be one Tupac poem that could have been set to music for him. Then again, writing the right defining piece for any character in a musical is notoriously difficult—having to choose from a fixed number of existing works to define that character is next to impossible. If it doesn't already exist, you've got nothing. Christopher Jackson's character has more character development and a couple of great songs. Maybe the story should have been built around his character, merging elements of John's story into his. Plus Jackson can sing. Williams can't—his few sung lines in Unconditional Love were not good.
I agree with the posters who suggested that the conceit of John's drawings creating the world of the play should have been followed through right to the end. It was a great idea that they just kind of dropped. I wish George C. Wolfe, a dramatist as well as a director, had helmed this show.
A silly final thought, but something I found distractingly implausible. That purple Cadillac that Griffy and Benny had painstakingly restored obviously meant everything to Griffy. He's constantly wiping every fingerprint and speck of dust off the finish. No car freak would let anyone even LEAN on such a car, much less let people dance on the hood and stomp around on the white leather seats. I guess you could say that with Griffy's father and best friend dead, he doesn't care anymore, he's just happy that the "rumble" didn't happen and everyone's having fun. But all I could think during California Love was "What is Griffy thinking about this?" :)
I found the show disappointing too. I had high hopes for it. There's lots of good material there and I loved most of the music and most of the cast, but I had two real problems with it.
First, the haphazard flow of energy and narrative drive. The book writer and director just let the tension flag too often. Whenever a number or plot point would gain momentum, the air would suddenly be let out of it, either with a poor finish to a number, or by an overlong, meandering, or poorly-placed book scene.
The second big problem for me was the lead character's performance—an inexcusable flaw in any show. Saul Williams may be a star of the slam poetry world, but he is not an engaging actor, advanced acting degree notwithstanding. There was no trace of sexuality in his portrayal of John. The character has just been released from years in prison, and to be sure, he's repressing his passion for the woman he lost to another man while locked up, but you need to see and feel that passion anyway—that sexual heat. The scenes between John and Corinne should smoulder once she breaks through the wall he's built, but they are cold. I also couldn't understand much of his rapping. At first I blamed the sound design, but later realized I could hear every lyric from all the other actors.
I can't help comparing him with Chad Boseman from the workshop, who oozed sex and longing despite his post-prison feelings of isolation. Boseman's powerful performance anchored John as the true heart of the show. He was superb. I look forward to seeing him in the film Get On Up, as James Brown in August. GetOnUpMovie.com
I think the lead character in this show deserves/needs at least one sung solo song that shows more than just his anger. One would think there might be one Tupac poem that could have been set to music for him. Then again, writing the right defining piece for any character in a musical is notoriously difficult—having to choose from a fixed number of existing works to define that character is next to impossible. If it doesn't already exist, you've got nothing. Christopher Jackson's character has more character development and a couple of great songs. Maybe the story should have been built around his character, merging elements of John's story into his. Plus Jackson can sing. Williams can't—his few sung lines in Unconditional Love were not good.
I agree with the posters who suggested that the conceit of John's drawings creating the world of the play should have been followed through right to the end. It was a great idea that they just kind of dropped. I wish George C. Wolfe, a dramatist as well as a director, had helmed this show.
A silly final thought, but something I found distractingly implausible. That purple Cadillac that Griffy and Benny had painstakingly restored obviously meant everything to Griffy. He's constantly wiping every fingerprint and speck of dust off the finish. No car freak would let anyone even LEAN on such a car, much less let people dance on the hood and stomp around on the white leather seats. I guess you could say that with Griffy's father and best friend dead, he doesn't care anymore, he's just happy that the "rumble" didn't happen and everyone's having fun. But all I could think during California Love was "What is Griffy thinking about this?" :)