Am I the only person who was incredibly disappointed in "Hamilton's America"? To me the entire 90 minutes felt like a trailer for the documentary we had been led to expect. It offered very little of the creative phase, very little of the rehearsal process, very little of the show itself, very little of the cultural impact. The one thing it had in abundance was a dumbed-down biography of Hamilton the man. It felt like they took a PBS "American Experience" episode and re-cut it for a lowest common denominator audience.
More than 100 hours of footage was filmed for this project. 98.5 hours wound up on the cutting room (where it happens) floor. How many..."shots" do you throw away in 98.5 hours?
It's called "Hamilton's America", not "the making of the musical Hamilton". Alex Horwitz has specifically commented that he did not delve into such things as its cultural impact besides some brief shots because that has been talked about ad infinitum elsewhere.
Hamilton Emotional Support Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/hamiltonsupport/
Telegram Spam said: "More than 100 hours of footage was filmed for this project. 98.5 hours wound up on the cutting room (where it happens) floor. How many..."shots" do you throw away in 98.5 hours?"
all of your premises are false. aside from what others have said, it is flatly untrue that >100hrs was filmed for this project. You are obviously collapsing the documentary and the archival recording of the show. As has been rehearsed from the get-go, these were done during the same several days but that's it. Your post reeks of the sort of egocentric self-entitlement that is endemic here.
I got exactly what I was expecting. We always knew it wasn't going to release much of the show itself.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
I really liked it and really wished I had seen it before I saw the show. I would have understood more of the Hamilton details if I had understood more of this background
I thought the documentary was fantastic and that's coming from someone definitely fatigued by Hamilton mania. I appreciated the historical anecdotes from Ron Chernow and the female historian, who's name escapes me, quite a bit more than the footage from the show.
I feel that if the original poster had read any of the press releases about the documentary he would have known right off the bat the purpose and the intention of the piece.
It sounds to me that the original poster formed an expectation of what the documentary was going to focus on and then when the documentary did not meet those expectations he was disappointed.
It's really unfair to say the filmmakers failed based off of perceived expectations.
The filmmakers set out to make and achieved very successfully the documentary that they intended.
There were two female historians: Joanne Freeman and Annette Gordon-Reed. Dr. Freeman was particularly enthusiastic with her live and post-doc reaction tweets.
Hamilton Emotional Support Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/hamiltonsupport/
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
I absolutely loved the doc! I was on the edge of my seat! I brought back so many feels as I just saw the show live and in person just under two weeks ago! One day Lin will unearth it from the bowels of Gringotts and we will get a full DVD of the show, but for now....I loved seeing the cast walk in the footsteps of who they are playing and get the history of their characters at the places where it happened.
Mr. Nowack said: "^^ I don't think anyone thought it was 100 hours of performance footage...
That would mean filming the entire show 33 times (or using 33 cameras lol!).
"
I never stated, nor suggested, I was only referring to Broadway performance footage. When I say "performance footage," that obviously includes any performance-related footage spanning the property's gestation from early-stage labs and workshops to award broadcasts and the off-Broadway presentation.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
macnyc said: "HogansHero, it has been widely reported as a direct quote from Alex Horwitz that when all was said and done, he had about 100 hours of footage. "
Quite a bit of it was not shot for this project. He also explained that the amount of performance footage he was allowed to use was very limited. The bottom line is that the person to whom I was responding seemed to want more of the performance shown and, as many of us have been saying since this was announced, that was never gonna happen. Furthermore, if you have eve been involved in the sort of interviews used in this you know that in most of what you get the interviewee sounds like a blithering idiot and the moments of piercinginsight that makes it into the finished product is just the crème de la crème.