Really digging casting choices so far, well, except for Streep, who is alright, but I would’ve much preferred Glenn Close or Catherine Zeta Jones. Emily Blunt is brilliant and I’m so happy she got the lead role. Even though she has played those mother’s type roles to death Julie Walters will be excellent as Jack's mother.
Now if only they will cast Angela Lansbury as granny. Not only she will be perfect, but it’ll be a nice homage to her and Sondheim‘s decades of collaboration and friendship. But I’m affair they are gonna go with Judi Dench.
I'd rather see Julie Walters play the Witch. She's one of the most criminally underused actresses around.
Of course, this is a Rob Marshall film, so.....
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
I'd love for the entire cast (whoever it ends up being) to do a one night concert version of the show on Broadway to promote the film before its released.
When was the last time Emily Blunt was more than serviceable in a movie? I loved her in THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA and have been really unimpressed by everything I've seen her in after that. Seems like I'm in the minority here but I'm so disappointed by the casting. I shouldn't be surprised though, I wonder if Streep pushed for her to be cast, she has gone on record saying she is one of her favorite younger actresses. On the other hand, Baranski as the Stepmother is a natural choice, perfection. Alison Janney would have been so good as Jack's mom, I've always pictured Rachel Dratch in the role but she probably isn't even allowed to audition with the kind of A-listers they're going after.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
I saw the McCarter's "Woods" last night and they made it clear, which a lot of productions don't, that they did a whole lot more than just "kiss"....
I don't know that this is something that needs to be made clearer, I feel like unless you're a kid the text itself and the original production make it very obvious that it wasn't just a kiss without needing to be extremely explicit about it.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
As for Blunt, it was last year's "Looper" that had many people jumping back on the fan bandwagon (me included). Prior to that, it's true, she kind of floundered her "Devil Wears Prada" potential.
I'm not quite sure why it matters when the last time Blunt was more than serviceable in a movie. It doesn't change the fact that she's an extremely talented actress who sings extremely well and is right for the Baker's Wife (of course I said the same thing about Amy Adams and didn't love her in the part but I digress).
Many great actors go through many years of more-or-less serviceable work because more inspired casting, direction and above all, good scripts, elude them.
And, as frowninghour just said, many greatly admired Blunt's performance in Looper (I have yet to see it but a friend recently told me she was spectacular in it; this stood out in my mind because I can't remember the last time this particular friend raved about an acting performance).
I guess LOOPER is the only film she has done since PRADA that tried to showcase her acting, I didn't think she was amazing or anything in it but I didn't think the movie itself was. It's an inevitable feeling when you're so invested in a film like this one, you want your favorite actors to be cast in your favorite roles and when people you don't like are cast, it's very disappointing. Blunt has been so boring for many years (THE QUEEN VICTORIA being a particular standout in the boring department) and been involved in plain unwatchable movies (like GULLIVER'S TRAVEL and THE FIVE YEAR ENGAGEMENT) that I really wish someone else had been cast. Better her than Sandra Bullock though.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
I guess LOOPER is the only film she has done since PRADA that tried to showcase her acting.
Blunt was absolutely sensational in SALMON FISHING IN THE YEMEN this past year and was rightfully nominated for a Golden Globe for her performance. In terms of her other post-PRADA work, I also thought she was really terrific in SUNSHINE CLEANING too, even if that movie as a whole was rather imperfect.
Tonya Pinkins: Then we had a "Lot's Wife" last June that was my personal favorite. I'm still trying to get them to let me sing it at some performance where we get to sing an excerpt that's gone.
Tony Kushner: You can sing it at my funeral.
She was incredible in Sunshine Cleaning and in a slew of other films. I have no doubt that she'll make an amazing Baker's Wife if she has indeed been cast in the role.
Blunt is a fantastic actress. I wasn't crazy about SUNSHINE CLEANING, but she and Adams were wonderful. And I agree with somethingwicked...if you haven't seen SALMON FISHING IN THE YEMEN, check it out! It's hardly anything incredible, but it's a sweet, lovely little movie with a charming & winning performance from Blunt.
I am 100% behind the idea of her playing the Baker's Wife.