Posted: 2/16/23 at 1:19pm
I attended two of the three RAH performances and saw him three times in Love Never Dies, and I can't say I share the above complaints about Mr. Karimloo. I will concede that I've never thought his voice was ideally suited to the role (although I think he was better in Love Never Dies than in Phantom of the Opera); I think he has a very strong voice, but it's a bit too rock-tinged for the character, who I feel should lean toward classical/operatic. However, my primary issue with him as the Phantom is the same as it has been for a number of the actors cast in later years (Josh Piterman and Peter Jöback also come to mind): they're simply too obviously handsome/pretty and even the makeup can't hide it. This is part of my problem with Paul Schaefer playing the role in the Broadway production.
To the best of my recollection, Karimloo launched the trend of casting actors who are too young and/or or too pretty to play a 40-50 year old "repulsive carcass". If the Phantom is handsome, the plot dissolves because there's simply no reason for Christine to be torn between him and Raoul.
"Michael Riedel...The Perez Hilton of the New York Theatre scene"
- Craig Hepworth, What's On Stage