Is it better for a show to have too many ideas, or too little?
That's the question you'll need to answer for yourself to decide how you'll feel about Jagged Little Pill (at least, in its current state, previews may vary).
Ultimately, I would side with the former, as it does most of them very well - they just don't all fit together like they should. Diablo Cody's book is witty and resonant without being melodramatic, the music is of course great, and the dancing is phenomenal. On the flip side, the structure of the show is disastrous, the music cuts in and out jarringly, and there is simply too much frenetic movement happening too often.
The talent on stage is undoubtable, and their intentions are admirable. Diane Paulus can make some very easy fixes by cutting the ensemble throughout 2 or 3 Act 1 numbers and instantly make the show feel more grounded and open. The narrative structure is largely unfixable at this point, it's too twisted. Small changes like lessening the son's involvement with the B plot could be done quickly, too. Overall, I'm glad it's making a lot of money, because it's absolutely one of the best jukebox musicals I've seen. It'll play forever regionally, and I'm sure a national tour will sell well on name recognition alone.
The biggest flaw to me is projections are downright hideous. I cannot believe a creative and producing team as esteemed and experienced as this has not fired or cut them. The 4 roving panels offer some nice moments of scene transitions, but imagining the show without them feels refreshing.
I do recommend it. Sure, it's like 13 Reasons Why: The Musical, but it's a fun binge and the music/performances are stellar. It won't win the Pulitzer, but it's Hamilton compared to a similar crowd pleaser like Beetlejuice. The show (as of today) is running about 2:40. Act 1 ended at 9:20, so it's a normal length - it's act 2 that runs long, although it's more enjoyable than Act 1 imo.
Updated On: 11/13/19 at 12:31 AM