I went to the matinee last Saturday. I was a little uncertain of my decision to pick up a seat in the front row (house left) when I read people mentioning the high stage, but thought ultimately that my 6'1 height would offset it. As it turns out, the stage was a tad too high for me, but not so high where I HAD to strain to see anything (there was one moment on the other side of the stage I missed a little of, but it's not like I didn't know what was happening). But anyway, on to the show...
Overall, I enjoyed it and I definitely see a future for this production on Broadway although it might even benefit from going the route American Psycho was going to go and first go off-Broadway with an eye on ultimately transferring at some point.
I agree with theaterdarling's comparison to an after school special (that nagged at me throughout the performance, ha!) though I don't think the book is that awful. I do think that they need to trim or cut some things entirely, like 20 minutes or so worth (maybe start by getting rid of the epilogue-like ending - people can draw their own conclusions). This show in no way needs to be nearly three hours long. Pick one or two terrible things to deal with, we don't need to see the kitchen sink thrown at this family!
I didn't think that the songs felt forced, as if they had Alanis Morrisette's discography sitting in front of them and just tried to check off as much as they could. "Ironic" is a bit of an exception to that, but you knew they were going to get it in somehow and at least they poked fun at it a bit.
It may have been because I was so close, but I hardly noticed the projections so fortunately wasn't distracted by them - though some of them when I forced myself to look or there was less going on onstage were pretty terrible. I would imagine/hope that the plan would be to replace some of those with actual scenic elements and maybe scrap others - sometimes the singer is enough to command the stage, you don't ALWAYS have to have something going on behind them. Also, I echo all the criticism of the band sliding on and off throughout the show. What the hell? Pick one or the other, either would be fine but good grief it was completely pointless and really seemed random.
As far as the performances, I really enjoyed Elizabeth Stanley and Lauren Patten, with honorable mention to Celia Gooding. The cool part about sitting so close was being able to see Stanley's tears (Derek Klena cries too!) but she was fantastic. Alanis would call it ironic, but coincidentally I went to see "On The Town" with the Boston Pops featuring Andy Karl, Brandon Victor Dixon, Andrea Martin, Marc Kudisch, et al the night before, and I realized I had seen Stanley in the revival years ago. I really really enjoyed Patten, and her "You Oughta Know" is wonderful. I had resolved not to stand after reading all the posts here as I think there are only certain rare instances where that's called for...like clockwork she got her standing O, but it took a while to develop and since I was in the first row, I stuck to my guns and clapped heartily while remaining seated.
There weren't any performances that I felt didn't work, but like some others have done, I did think about who might end up cast in a Broadway production should they decide to part with anyone from the current company. While I certainly didn't mind Antonio Cipriano's performance, nor did I mind (very slight spoiler) when he jumped from the stage right in front of me, Isaac Powell came to mind as a possibility in that role.
All in all I'm glad I went, and I'd recommend anyone who finds themselves in or around Boston between now and mid-July who's thinking about checking it out to do so. I don't know that I would make a special trip for it, unless pairing it with a Moulin Rouge performance or something. I live in the area, so I do plan on trying to check it out once more before it closes so I can see it from a different perspective, as seeing it up close is great but you do miss some of the larger picture.