hork said: "
I'm usually in agreement with you about movie musicals, so I'm surprised you were so taken with this one, since I don't think Chazelle understands the art of musical filmmaking at all. He definitely doesn't understand the importance of filmic editing, judging by his choice to not use any during most of the musical numbers. The opening number is especially misguided, I feel, since everything that's "impressive" about it occurs behind the camera rather than in front of it. Sorry, I'm still not over how sloppy and ham-handed this movie turned out to be, in my opinion. "
I think the essence of musical filmmaking is understanding that it is about sung thoughts. So creating a scene that is not literal. Embracing the fantasy of this artform, which, if done right, results in raw emotion for the audience. There are various things that support that given. Pre-recorded tracks, in combination with smart editing, or smart camera work, slow motion, sung words as a voice over, etc really support this. Examples of fantastic editing are "Someone in the crowd" and the whole montage at the end, as well as the dream sequences. Scenes with less editing but still very interesting camera work are "Another day of sun" and "lovely night dance", but the dancing and the moving camera's take over a lot from the editing there. All these different approaches combined, playing with the fantasy throughout the film is wonderful in my opinion.
Updated On: 1/31/17 at 09:29 PM