I finally got to see this on Wednesday night. Had very good seats in the front mezzanine...paid more than I have ever paid for a show.
There is really only one strong reason to see this show. Lea Michele is giving one of the greatest musical performances I have seen in 57 years of theatregoing. She was amazing, on every front. Her singing was great, as I expected. Her acting still exceeded my expectations, despite all the strong raves I have read. She WAS Fanny Brice. Her comedy for me was also stellar. It just all came together, on every cylinder.
Thinking about it, I think she gave the single best performance I have seen in a musical since Nathan Lane in The Producers, over 20 years ago, and before that, Angela Lansbuty in Gypsy, 47 years ago. It was definitely a performance for the ages.
What makes those statements so amazing is that the show around her was just not good. The score is great. the book is mediocre, the sets are cheesy (though not as bad as I expected, based on comments from this board and the reviews), the orchestra sounded tinny, Act 2 has several stinker numbers. First, the number for Nick was just a complete waste of time...the song itself was Tier 3 Styne (I assume it was Styne), no one cared about Arnstein, the staging was lousy...just a complete waste of time. Rat-Tat-Tat-Tat, which I think was more elaborate a number in the original production, was just a further waste of time, and I seem to think there was another, but I don't remember right this minute.
Besides Michelle and the music, the only other real positives were Grimes and Feldshuh. It was great to see Feldshuh mugging it up shamelessly, and she added depth to the scenes that were dramatic. I suspect they built up Karimoo's role so he would sign on; they shouldn't have bothered. He was fine, but who wants to see Nicky Arnstein's role expanded.
Despite m ycriticisms, I loved the evening. The excitement in the air was palpable, a performance that will be legendary lived up to all the hype, and those Fanny numbers were, to quote a review I once read, 'Musical Comedy Heaven.'
Now someone needs to write a new musical for Michelle. Failing that, or in addition to that, a smart director should cast the next revival of Gypsy with an age-appropriate Rose, and that person should be Lea Michelle. (Note: Rose Havoc was 21 when one of her daughters was born, 22 when the other was born. I think a lot of layers could be added to Gypsy by having a 30 something playing Rose. Add a few gray hairs in the later scenes, and the span of 10 - 15 years is fine).
One last comment...I can't even imagine how awful this must have been with Beanie and Jane Lynch. You would have had all the negatives I mentioned, compounded by a Fanny who couldn't sign (I've seen You-Tube), must have looked ridiculous in the scenes with Karimoo, and a 6' mother who made no attempt to be Jewish (per everything I would have read).