Finally watched this... not sure what people expected Walken to do, but he delivered exactly what it seemed he was meant to. I still don't get why Peter Pan has to be played by a girl, but barring that Williams was fine. I also enjoyed the swishbucklers and the lost boy toys, especially fun to see Daniel Quadrino and Jason Gotay, just because I've bumped into them at shows/events in the past.
That said, I did construct a backstory how when the kids were gone and her husband was somehow off in another reality being a pirate, a National Geographic photographer knocked on Mrs. Darling's door because he had trouble finding an old chimney he was shooting for a pictorial, and they had this magical connection, and just for a moment she wondered about the life she was living... and could she walk away from it all?
Walken danced like he was recovering from a hip replacement. The Lost Boys looked like they just came from "Spring Awakening". Why on earth did they cast a bunch of twenty-somethings?
I thought the whole broadcast was "meh". Kelli O'Hara was great in the little on screen time she had. Christopher Walken she be imprisoned for giving one of the most wooden and boring performances I have ever seen and actor give. Overall the whole thing left me cold.
"There’s nothing quite like the power and the passion of Broadway music. "
"Finally watched this... not sure what people expected Walken to do, but he delivered exactly what it seemed he was meant to"
Read lines off cue cards? He was embarrassing. I have seen 16 year olds give better Hook performances. He's an Oscar winner for crap sake and he completely bombed.
Funny. There are valid criticisms to be made. Many made in this thread. Unfortunately, no one seems to have any desire to do much more than pile on trash talking everything except "Broadway royalty" and seek out more things to trash talk, even the parts that do not merit trash talking, but just because it is "the thing to do.."
There are two types of character actor- the virtuosic, who disappears completely into a role, and the more common "character-actor" (note the hyphen), where the character will always be the actor, but the actor's delivery and style is specific enough that that isn't a problem.
Walken may have begun his career as an actor, and maybe even a virtuosic actor, but discovered his fame and fortune when he embraced the Walken "persona" and has not deviated from it since. It helps also that he is rich as hell, and is basically doing this stuff to amuse himself in his old age.
If ABC ever catch on to this it could make a good production but they do have the PL Travers fiasco of them not wanting another adaption, the. Again she gave her blessing on the musical so stranger things have happened.
First of all, let's just agree that this was MUCH better than Sound of Music. But NBC, please get a new director! Everything was so flat. The acting, the singing, everything. Luckily Williams was not as flat as Walken. Walken's dancing wasn't too bad for being 71 years old. Sets were awesome. The trees though? What was up with that. I felt like I was tripping on Acid. Hopefully next year will get better! If they improve every year maybe in 10 years it'll be worthy to go to Broadway!
I was on the set during the final week or so of rehearsals there was not room for teleprompters or cue cards with all the freaking cameras everywhere. Mr. Nowack, he was looking at a place, two stars to the left, a place where time in never planned, it's not on any chart, you must find it with your heart, "Christopher Walken Land!"
Those Blocked: SueStorm. N2N Nate. Good riddence to stupid! Rad-Z, shill begone!
I didn't realize you were a part of the production. very cool. Was Christopher doing the same thing in rehearsals? The director didn't tell him his acting choices weren't landing?