As mentioned earlier, Whoopi and the ladies of 'The View' saw this opening night and raved about it the next day. Makes me wonder if ABC has money invested in this, or Whoopi and Meghan have their own money invested in this?
One thing which caught my attention was the number of times they mentioned 'affordable prices' for tickets. They kept mentioning to 'take the family it's affordable', 'tickets are affordable', 'affordable tickets' - WTH?
Well, I would say I doubt they’d ever say they had a horrible time even if they did. It could also be they like Clay and/or Ruben (or the charity) so want to support them. Or they genuinely had a good time. Of course, I didn’t see the segment so maybe something else is going on.
With a discount code at 50% off, you can get tickets for $48 in the rear mezz. Orchestra seats would be $85.
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
And free (or nearly so) is pretty darned affordable.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
dramamama611 said: "Usually, any donations are made AFTER costs are made. It's unlikely that everyone (or even anyone)is doing it for free. (But there's still rent, costumes, rights etc to be paid.)"
Wait a second, can we go back to this?
I would have thought that the donations were built into the weekly running cost, but you're saying that's not the case? So if they don't meet their weekly nut, then no money is donated? And in this case, since the show is bombing financially, that is the same as saying that this show will not be donating a cent to charity. Correct?
The performers and musicians involved need to be paid. The landlord needs to be paid. This isn't an instance of everyone donating their time and resources for a charitable cause.
The production states that a "portion of the proceeds" will be going to the National Inclusion Project, not that they are just donating a sum of money. Money needs to be coming in for that portion to be taken out.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Kad said: "The performers and musicians involved need to be paid. The landlord needs to be paid. This isn't an instance of everyone donating their time and resources for a charitable cause.
The production states that a"portionof the proceeds" will be going to the National Inclusion Project, not that they are just donating a sum of money. Money needs to be coming in for that portion to be taken out."
Sure, that makes sense. I just figured that they would take the charity portion out of the gross, then use the rest of the gross to pay for the running costs, then whatever the rest of the gross doesn't cover will be paid for by the investors - or where ever the money usually comes from when a show doesn't meet its weekly running cost.
As you can probably tell, I don't have experience with the financial logistics of charity-contribution performances like this. Based on your and Dramamamma's comments, it sounds like what they're doing is pretty standard practice. So that's that. I guess it's just sort of sad that a show can market itself as donating to charity, when in reality it never actually does (whether through fault of their own, or not).
From Vocab.com: Proceeds are the money brought in from a transaction or event. ... Proceeds can mean either the gross money earned (all that was brought in) or the net (the money left after expenses). If you are very concerned about where the money you donate to charity goes, this is a good question to ask.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
That's enough. It's an OBJECTIVE measurement of success. FRIENDS liking your show means nothing, btw. Critics are SUBJECTIVE. Finances are specific, finite and proof.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Yup. The only objective success is box office. That said, if you like the show, then good times, you can see a show you want to see and not pay a lot to do it. Win-win! Beyond that, I'm not sure why you want to keep trying to convince us that everyone is loving it... and that is breaking box office records.
Wow. Another deleted comment addressing MassiveMeGo's repeated refutation of literal facts in this thread. The mods are really doing a bang-up job of exercising judgment in which posts and posters to scrutinize on this board.
-Sincerely,
A long-time poster who thinks "Trumpian self-delusion" is actually an accurate description and not an attack.
CHURCH DOOR TOUCAN GAY MARKETING PUPPIES MUSICAL THEATER STAPLES PERIOD OIL BITCHY SNARK HOLES
Nowadays, if you blink, a post is deleted. At times, I am thinking did I actually post this or read this. The real issue is there is no consistency on what is deleted or edited.
I was thinking about this show at work this morning...
This could have done very well (both critically and in the ratings) had it been done as a one-night only TV special. Hosting and main performances by Clay & Ruben, cut the awkward skits/dialogue and being in a legit team that could shape together bits, bring on other popular American Idol contestants, etc.
It’s a lot to expect people to pay actual money to see this product instead of paying in time at home. I don’t know how this was chosen as a limited-run show on Broadway when it could have been better in every possible way on television.
On the Town With Aubrey Reuben Where All the Stars Shine Brightly! December 15, 2018
Ruben & Clay's First Annual Christmas Show , at the Imperial Theatre features the two singers, Ruben Studdard and Clay Aiken . Five other members in the cast, directed by Jonathan Tessero , accompany them in a salute to the Christmas season. All are wonderful singers, and sing all the traditional Christmas songs. It is the perfect gift for the holidays. The audience enjoyed every moment, and gave the cast a standing ovation. We celebrated the opening at Copacabana.
On show-score, the average critic score is 59 (out of a 100) and the average member score is 67. If this was an exam, its grade would either be a D or an F.
Again, I wish Clay or Ruben no ill will, but your incessant misconstruing of the facts including critical and public reception to this show are doing the show no favors.
The reality is that nothing you or we say on this thread will impact the show’s success or failure. If we were that powerful, Pretty Woman and Mean Girls would be flops and Torch Song would be breaking box office records
MassiveMeGo said: "Just this."nothing you or we say on this thread will impact the show’s success or failure." Try to remember that."
I will if you will. And one has to wonder if you know your misconstruing of facts isn’t helping the show succeed, why are you doing it? Is it just for attention? If so, that’s sad.