Good point, skittles.
HOWEVER, we can't even really say whether the producers thought that Raul would be big enough alone? Doyle's a Tony-winning director. The show's themes have mass appeal, and nobody ever capitlalized on that enough.There are many, many things that should have been done differently. But I'm not a producer. That's not my job. I never COULD be a producer. But I have to wonder if anyone ever even
expected this to take off and be a major success.
But still, you are blatantly missing the point. BCR's post said that Raul is a box office draw within. the. theater. world. He never said that he was a box office draw and left it at that. In doing that, he's saying you can argue that Raul's name appeals to theater fans -- the majority of a minority, if you will. YOU break it down. Box office draw means that the name draws. people. in. If we're talking about the rest of the world, then no, it's not true. If we're talking about the theater community, which is what got this discussion started in the first place, then yes, it's totally valid. He brings people in. I don't get why you seem to think that any level of box office draw is irrelevant to the point of being non-existant unless it keeps a show from closing. He got people in, which you cannot ignore simply because he wasn't enough to keep the show open longer and sell it out, etc. Look at it this way: with a complete unknown, the show may have closed even sooner, because you would have lost the people who came in to see him. I know, though, they don't exist.
I'm tired of repeating myself, so I'm not going to explain it again. And I have to go out. To get tickets to the show. To see my favorite non-box office draw. So you can chew on that for a while, yeah?
A work of art is an invitation to love.