uncageg said: "James Edwards2 said: "uncageg said: "James Edwards2 said: "Has it been discussed why, in today's world, Sean Hayes has not been called out for developing a play for himself where he plays a Jewish man? Oscar Levant was the child of Russian Jewish immigrants. This was certainly a large part of Levant's character. Being Jewish in this case does not simply refer to his born religion, but instead to his DNA. He was in his 30s during the Holocaust. Many of his mannerisms, which Mr. Hayes is doing his best to mimic, could be said to be mannerisms associated with that of a Jewish man. Hayes would certainly NOT be allowed to do this with any other ethnicity. Would it be okay if Hayes were playing a Mexican man? Additionally, I'm not sure if the playwright or the director are Jewish. But even if they were, this still feels like a bit of Jew-Face going on here. Why not cast a Jewish man to play this role? The original playwright, David Adjmi, who had the idea for this play is Jewish but he is no longer involved. I'm wondering why this is not being discussed anywhere. It feels like quite the double-standard."
Oh dear Lord. Let it go. They are actors. ACTORS. I guess next you want to replace the entire cast of the current revival of Sweeney Todd. Just to name one.
The man is giving an OUTSTANDING performance.
"
I would normally agree with you, but precedents have now been set for this sort of thing. They just generally don't apply to Jewish people which is why I raised the question. Sarah Silverman has spoken out about this topic at length. And from what I saw in the video, Mr. Hayes appeared a little phony and uneven to me in the role. I felt like we were watching Hayes play dress up. I'm sure it's much more convincing in a large theater. But it seemed like Hayes was putting on the affectations of a Jewish man instead of actually embodying the character. I'll reserve judgment for when I see it live and I hope I am fully convinced."
Wait? Did you say you will "reserve judgement" for when you see it live? All of this and you have NOT seen the entire performance yet? Read your comments. You have already judged his performance.
"
I only articulated why I started to wonder if maybe a Jewish actor in the role could have inhabited it in a more realistic, compelling way. I said I might be wrong and will have to see the performance live. The NY Times review seems to be in line with what I witnessed in the video - "The work is startling, but the performance is less an inhabitation of character than a nonstop loop of perfectly rendered facial tics, trembling hands and compulsive gestures. His speech is pressured, his mood explosive, his target anything that crosses his path — including himself. Past this stockade of behavior, little of an inner life can get out." This thread was not about his performance anyway. It was about the rules of our society and when someone can and can't play a role. I was speaking about what I saw since a few of you seem to think his performance is perfection. Maybe it's not?