In all seriousness. I think there are two issues surrounding these kinds of casting situations. If a white person is cast to play a BIPOC, trans or disabled character, it's often denying the role to an actor from a historically under-employed group. We're still on the road to fixing that disparity and have a long way to go. That feels like issue number one to me.
I think we get tripped up on the second issue, often when the word "authenticity" enters the picture. No actor is acting authentic to their experience. Is an actor from the specific cultural background of the character likely better equipped to play that part? Probably in almost every circumstance. But. Most actors have the capability to bring studied authenticity of a character, culture, background and experience through research and skill. Someone who grew up in America, from Colombian heritage isn't going to understand a character currently living in Venezuela. No group is a monolith (as pointed out there are several cultural groups of Black Jewish heritage). While Sean Hayes isn't Jewish, he's well versed in the comedy/broadway culture pioneered by certain aspect of Jewish culture. Even on that tv show he clearly understood the borscht belt/vaudevillian/classic broadway timing so associated with Oscar Levant and his contemporaries. Blythe Danner, mother of the greatest WASP to walk the earth, is not, was not, and didn't appear interesting in learning. It's not just that she was cast in a Jewish role but she didn't bring any studied authenticity to bear. It's not so much her casting but her actual performance that is offensive all these years later.
I know that folks make the argument that casting ALWAYS be culturally authentic and that no one outside a specific culture could EVER represent a character from that culture. I do not agree... but as someone who is white, I leave space for that position and won't argue it.
The difference between casting a great non-Jewish actor giving a great, "authentic" performance vs Jonathan Pryce playing an Asian role is the erasure of all the qualified Asian actors who very easily could have given a performance at the level of Jonathan Pryce. I never saw Jonathan Pryce's performance so I can't speak to whether or not he did to Vietnamese cultural heritage what Blythe Danner did to Jewish cultural heritage. I think it's possible he gave a great performance, but at the cost of the erasure not of a cultural heritage but of actual human performers notoriously under represented and underemployed at that time.
To compare casting Sean Hayes in this part, who by most accounts is giving a tremendous, studied, and "authentic" performance to the white washed casting of BIPOC, trans, or disabled roles is... I think... a little bit of intentional inauthenticity.
Jesus saves. I spend.
Updated On: 4/25/23 at 03:23 PM