Posted: 8/7/12 at 12:40pm
The Public Theatre's Shakespeare/Park presents INTO THE WOODS -- Discussion — Page 34
Posted: 8/7/12 at 12:58pm
That picture is ridiculous, hahahaha.
Updated On: 8/7/12 at 12:58 PM
Posted: 8/7/12 at 1:10pm
Posted: 8/7/12 at 1:25pm
I noticed that when the Witch picks up one of Rapunzel's babies towards the end after Rapunzel dies, the baby seems to fall and turn to dust. Does anyone know what the deal is with that? Are both babies dust? (Also, whatever happens to Rapunzel's prince, is he ever accounted for?)
Posted: 8/7/12 at 3:44pm
Posted: 8/7/12 at 3:53pm
The implications whent he Witch discovers the babies are "dust" is that they've been dead for QUITE a while. Rapunzel who is drinking and crazy has been pushing around two dead babies in a pram for months. It's quite chilling and makes the witch turn cold, bitter, and angry.
Posted: 8/7/12 at 3:55pm
^ That's what I took from it as well. The twins died from neglect during Rapunzel's downfall. I can't remember if Donna did it when I saw it, but she now screams when she discovers the twins are dead.
And yet again, the Witch loses another opportunity to be a mother.
Updated On: 8/7/12 at 03:55 PM
Posted: 8/7/12 at 4:25pm
My interpretation: Now that Rapunzel is gone the twins have in essence died with her, turning to dust.
They were linked to her, when she was banished by the Witch. Now the Witch can't have them either. Spell broken.
That sort of mythical idea...
Posted: 8/7/12 at 4:32pm
Posted: 8/7/12 at 4:38pm
I did think that once Rapunzel died, the twins died with her (although that doesnt make lots of sense), but I also like in a morbid and perverse way the idea that she had been pushing around dead babies for a while. Shows how unstable and out of it she had become. She blames the Witch for making her perpetually messed up and unhappy, which, in turn, has destroyed her ability to be a fit mother and provide "grandchildren" to the Witch. Careful the things you do, children will see and learn...
Posted: 8/7/12 at 5:02pm
I loved how Rapunzel came out from behind the set in the Regent's Park production pushing the stroller and drinking out of the alcohol bottle. The lighting was so cool for that part. I loved how it was lit from behind so it silhouetted Rapunzel and the stroller... Do they still do that for the Public?
Posted: 8/7/12 at 5:06pm
And it looks like someone finally told Broadway World that Paris Remillard has been playing Rapunzel's Prince.. only took them a week.
Posted: 8/7/12 at 5:25pm
Posted: 8/7/12 at 6:31pm
Posted: 8/7/12 at 6:34pm
Posted: 8/7/12 at 6:40pm
He loses interest in favour of Snow White (or is it Sleeping Beauty)?
Posted: 8/7/12 at 7:05pm
Even the Wolf needs standards
Posted: 8/7/12 at 7:46pm
Posted: 8/8/12 at 12:06am
Into The Woods Extends Through Sept. 1
Posted: 8/8/12 at 12:23am
It is always sad when an actor you love fails in a great role. It is doubly sad when two such actors do it in the same show. As the Baker and his Wife, O'Hare and Adams lack warmth, charm, love, wit, comic chops, and chemistry. And even presence. Adams's singing is ok. O'Hare's is horrible. Shockingly, Adams's gestures are trite and mechanical to the point of amateurishness. The duo's insipid costumes only emphasize the blandness of their performances. To summarize, the two characters who are the heart and soul of this musical disappear on that stage, brutally outclassed by everything else around them. I couldn't begin to explain how so much went wrong with Adams's performance. But it strikes me that O'Hare may be miscast. When Adams sings "You're passionate, charming, considerate, clever," all I could think is "NOT IN THIS SHOW HE'S NOT!"
Sorry. I am sincerely not enjoying reporting any of this.
I loved everything else about this production. Murphy is nothing short of spectacular. And she looks great! The rest of the cast is uniformly wonderful. The standouts: Mueller, soulfully underplaying, sings angelically. Stiles, whom I found terribly annoying in On A Clear Day, makes Red's every moment vivid, true, witty and fascinating. Zien does everything one would expect from him and more. Glick is charming. Zbornik - a great impressionist, here she seems to be cleverly channeling Katey Sagal - is hilarious.
The framing device and use of the child narrator is compelling and makes the final scenes much richer than they were. The hot scenes do not jump the sexual shark, at all. Innuendo is kept in proper balance with the wolf's dinner, the suggestion of going down on Red - based on the position of her body beyond the sheet - may be unmistakable, but only unmistakable as a metaphorical inference, not as an actual event. As such, it remains just this side of too much. The choreography works quite well and the special scenic effects are first rate (of course one might want the Witch's transformation to be more presto chango, but it's not belabored, and, being in the park, I give them a handicap). With the notable exceptions of Adams and O"Hare, and the Steward's (which I don't really get at all), the costumes work well.
I don't know why the twins turn to dust, but I'm fascinated by it and find it thought provoking. Maybe the kids were her delusion. Maybe Rapunzel smothered them just like she was smothered. Maybe she neglected them in her madness.
One more thing. Murphy's "Last Midnight" alone is, worth the price of admission, or in this case worth standing in line for hours for.
Updated On: 8/8/12 at 12:23 AM
Posted: 8/8/12 at 1:35am
I couldn't figure out the Steward's costume either. I thought maybe the Princes were supposed to be "pop star princes" or something to that effect and he was their manager... Maybe? Who knows. It needs to be made clear and that shouldn't be something the audience has to figure out or mull over too much.
It's general, bland choices and sacrificing the brilliant material for an innovative LOOK that are holding this production back.
Updated On: 8/8/12 at 01:35 AM
Posted: 8/8/12 at 1:57am
I honestly think whoever plays this role will never be good enough for some people. Gleason's performance is so ingrained in all of our heads.
Updated On: 8/8/12 at 01:57 AM
Posted: 8/8/12 at 2:03am
The Baker's Wife has a pretty spectacular journey of coming into her own and truly learning something new about herself and the world around her over the course of the story, and though she couldn't be more charming, I don't think Adams delved into any of that. Her Baker's Wife is the exact same person from beginning to end, and she plays no subtext and charts no emotional arc to speak of. "Moments in the Woods" was a perfect example for me of why I was so troubled by her- that song is full of complex and vivid emotion that gives the actor performing it a world of things to play, and I felt like Adams did absolutely nothing with it other than sing it pleasantly. She goes through the entire show being spunky and cute, but she doesn't come close to scratching the surface of what is (for my money) the most interesting character in the piece.
It's a very serviceable performance, to be sure, but it's not anywhere near memorable or effective in the least.
Tony Kushner: You can sing it at my funeral.
Updated On: 8/8/12 at 02:03 AM
Posted: 8/8/12 at 8:14am
Wicked the only thing the Steward's costume vaguely suggested to me is that he spent his day on the golf course instead of ministering to the kingdom. Not a bad choice, perhaps, but, as you said, it wasn't clear and there is no reason we should be left to surmise. (And unlike the dusty twins, this particular mystery has no poetry, rather than intrigue us, it merely nonplusses.)
Oh, and I forgot to mention that Amy's hair, while not quite as bad as it appears in some stills, is horrid.
Updated On: 8/8/12 at 08:14 AM
Posted: 8/8/12 at 9:46am
Just to throw in my 2 cents on the show, I absolutely loved the production. I agree that Dennis was the extreamly weak link. I hated his performance (As a side not I do love Dennis usually) I guess I am in the minority but I really liked Amy's Bakers Wife. The obvious stand outfit me was Donna Murphy as The Witch she was IMHO perfection! I also really liked the new child narrator take a lot. I feel like it added something new to the show for me and I personally enjoyed it.
I absolutely loved the set and the giant was stunning! Over all I think this is a great production and well worth the time I wated for my free tickets!
BroadwayWorld TV