Truly have NO idea what critics will think. (The critics who loved the recent revivals of Carousel and Oklahoma!, on the far ends of the spectrum.) Looks like there's plenty of inventory to move for March and April, and a show this big ($15million) certainly isn't critic-proof. Guess we'll find out in 12 hours.
Georgeanddot2 said: "I'm predicting fair reviews that will illustrate what a dumpster fire this production is with a brief mention of the controversy."
Seconded. Maybe with a brief mention of Isaac Powell since I've heard good things about his portrayal?
Piparoo said: "I'm predicting strongly positive reviews for the production with no more than a single paragraph devoted to the protests"
I'd be shocked if they include more than that. It's worthwhile to mention it in a sentence or two, but this is a review of the show onstage, not a feature article chronicling the production's strange road to Broadway. Like Spider-Man and Mockingbird and plenty of other shows with controversies: make a passing mention, and then move on to the content of the show. (The NYT, for example, has already covered the Ramasar situation in 10 stories from the past year alone.)
Do we know if green or Brantley is reviewing this one?
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
Georgeanddot2 said: "I'm predicting fair reviews that will illustrate what a dumpster fire this production is with a brief mention of the controversy."
“Fair reviews” and “dumpster fire” don’t exactly correlate...
GreasedLightning said: "Georgeanddot2 said: "I'm predicting fair reviews that will illustrate what a dumpster fire this production is with a brief mention of the controversy."
“Fair reviews” and “dumpster fire” don’t exactly correlate..."
InTheBathroom1 said: "The NYTimes LOVES Rudin so I expect a Critics Pick no matter what. "
I thought that was only Isherwood
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
InTheBathroom1 said: "The NYTimes LOVES Rudin so I expect a Critics Pick no matter what. "
That’s kind of an idiotic blanket statement, though he’s had some great critical successes. Your statement would be more believable if it was about Van Hove, which Brantley in the NYT has generally favored. But this is also a beloved musical and something much more ambitious than IVH’s past work. We’ll find out around 11pm tonight.
GreasedLightning said: "Georgeanddot2 said: "I'm predicting fair reviews that will illustrate what a dumpster fire this production is with a brief mention of the controversy."
“Fair reviews” and “dumpster fire” don’t exactly correlate..."
I think it would be fair, maybe even too kind to call this production a dumpster fire.
is this what one calls a pan? Not a critic pick, mostly does not like the video or the choreography from what I gather. Barely discusses the performances.
is this what one calls a pan? Not a critic pick, mostly does not like the video or the choreography from what I gather. Barely discusses the performances."
Not as cruel as he’s been in the past, but it’s certainly an “ouch.” Not what the production would be hoping for. He did like a few elements.
is this what one calls a pan? Not a critic pick, mostly does not like the video or the choreography from what I gather. Barely discusses the performances."
Not as cruel as he’s been in the past, but it’s certainly an “ouch.” Not what the production would be hoping for. He did like a few elements."
I’d say Brantley being overall meh is even worse then his cruel gems he likes to insert.