I think it's a keepsake of the moment, and I understand that. I haven't gotten an autograph in years, because the stage door scene is so different than it was a few decades ago. Internet selling of signed swag changed all that.
I suppose having signed proof of an object that somebody famous touched is perceived as cool. It's a chance for them to physically connect to a person they admire in some retroactive way.
When I was a kid, my mom took me backstage for the national tour of 1776. She had a friend in the cast, and they all met me on stage (curtain closed) and presented me with the signed Declaration of Independence. Most of the cast had signed it during the show and the rest afterward. I'm sure they did that every performance, but this was "my lucky moment." It's a reminder of seeing my first big professional show and meeting some truly talented actors afterward (George Hearn, Rex Everhart, etc.). For an 8-year-old, it was magic.
In my late teens and early 20s I got autographs from people I admired. Not a big collector, but I'm certainly happy with the ones I have.
When I was a second-grader, Margaret Hamilton (the Wicked Witch of the West) became my pen pal for the school year. I have signed photos, postcards, and letters from her. I treasure them. I was offered some good cash for them a few years ago, and it seemed so bizarre. Why would someone want this correspondence addressed to someone else? A kid from the Midwest. To me, they're of value, but to others?
It's a little strange on the other side, when, as an author, I'm asked to sign my books and people actually tell me, "Don't personalize it, just make it generic. It will be worth more that way in the future."
Part of me thinks, "from your lips to God's ears," and finds it flattering, and part of me thinks it's a little weird, but I do it.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 7/19/13 at 01:46 PM