TBFL said: "CurtisTaylorJr2 said: "OhHiii said: "CurtisTaylorJr2 said: "Call it a difference of opinion, but from my point of view it was giving when a church soloist messes up a high note and tries to growl through it. I listened to Rachel Tucker while there was a growl there it was much cleaner."
Vocal pedagogy isn't a matter of opinion, btw."
Whatever you want to speculate, it did not sound good and I'm not alone in thinking that. If it was a vocal choice it didn't sound very good to me and I'm surprised anyone thought that was intentional. Even if it was it sounded painful."
I don't think it sounded painful at all, and i'm not alone in thinking that...
Why would you think they'd use a bad vocal take for the film?? That makes zero sense
"
Maybe that's the best she could do and they used it.