"So they should have closed the show and put a couple of hundred people out of work instead of recasting the role with another performer? You are definitely not a Rand Paul devotee -- you actually want these people to go on unemployment!"
"And put up to 200 people out of work? I am sure they will appreciate you holding their place in the unemployment line on a cold January morning. Will you be there to hold their places in line or you will you be the one who comes by with pay it forward cups of coffee to keep them warm or will you be at home wrapped in your snuggie on your sofa cuddling with your cat and a warm mug of hot chocolate?"
Oh dear, no one wants people to go on unemployment. I am growing tired of this argument. Are you an employee of the show, or do you know someone who is? First of all, show closings will always be part of the business. The people who work on this need to know this and understand this. A show shouldn't be kept open just to keep people employed, as sad as it would be for people to be out of a job. If a show is struggling to stay open, it needs to close. I can't say this is the specific case for Cinderella; however, stunt casting (whether Carly is good or bad) is usually the start of it.
If you're going to argue anything in this thread, debate about Laura's replacement.
"We like to snark around here. Sometimes we actually talk about theater...but we try not to let that get in our way." - dramamama611
Updated On: 12/29/13 at 09:52 PM