I saw the final preview last night and my sentiments about this were about the same as I had from "Death of a Salesman" - some great performances, some terrible directorial choices, and a very weird handling of the supernatural elements of the piece. It's almost as if the directors don't trust the material and so are overdoing it with flash-bang effects.
Samuel Jackson was very good in a smaller role than the advertising lets on, and his recounting of the history of the piano in Act I was fantastic. I also found Danielle Brooks to be great as well, playing her role with emotional stoicism that finally cracks throughout Act II. I agree with the posters on the Previews page that Michael Potts and Ray Fisher, both theatre veterans, are by and large the best parts of the show, and their connsumate professionalism and theatrical presence sometimes comes close to upstaging their more famous co-stars.
The BIGGEST problem, by and far, is John David Washington. His daddy, he ain't. I can surmise from the dialogue that his character can be a bit of an impulsive hothead and fast talker, but even the most severe of these types can still have moments of subtlety. Whether through direction or personal acting choice, it all feels very one-note and comes in at an unrelenting 10, like he swallowed a handful of uppers before charging on stage. After a while, I just felt like I was being shouted at by him and it wasn't really giving me any reason to feel like Boy Willie had a case to take the piano (which I feel like he should). Halfway through the play, all I could see is that he reminded me of Chris Redd doing his Kayne impression from SNL (based on manic energy alone).
Of the play revivals I've seen, this was a bit of a disappointment, but slightly better than Death of a Salesman. Thus far, my MVP for play revival this year is "TOPDOG/UDNERDOG" by a mile
Check out my eBay page for sales on Playbills!!
www.ebay.com/usr/missvirginiahamm