Wow, after seeing that 13 minutes of what seems to be the best they've got to offer, I ask that decades-old question: What is the reason for this musical to exist? It appears to be the kind of adaptation that depends on the audience being familiar with original source material, but oops, if they are, they'll likely be asking, WHY?
Yes, no doubt the cast is filled with Broadway-caliber talent – the most impressive for me is Janet Dacal – but it doesn't seem that her character has much at stake except wanting to be closer to her family and to break a writer's block, no? Not exactly compelling stuff; just an excuse for lots of pointless production numbers. In fact, from that ending, etc., this enterprise seems 50% Alice in Wonderland and 50% Wizard of Oz – 100% wrongheaded.
Yes, Karen Mason is a fabulous singer, but I found her “Off with Their Heads” number embarrassing. And why do the girls behind her look Asian? Doubly so for Jose Llana's Cheshire cat mess in barrio, and the Caterpillar's number which reminded so much of the embarrassing number Maurice Hines had to perform in the hideous “Bring Back Birdie.”
Yes again, Kate Shindle is obviously quite gifted as a musical comedy actress (all the actors are completely blameless here), but her songs (all songs I heard here in fact) seem far more destined to be belt audition songs more than anything else. Frank Wildhorn writes great pop melodies, but that does necessarily yield a strong musical comedy score.
And I also very much agree with the poster who was trouble by the “homage” (i.e. rip-off) of Meredith Willson's “Trouble.” For the family audience this one is clearly aimed toward, that bit of inside joke (taken too far) will be lost on them anyway.
I saw tons of Broadway and OB musicals (most all of them in every season) while I lived in NYC from the early 70s to the mid-90s – and have visited numerous time since leaving.
Because I see so few new shows these days, I rely on these promotional videos to give me some cue about the show. Of the dozen or more I've seen this season the one I saw today from “Catch Me If You Can,” has been the most impressive to me, and the one for which I would purchase a ticket. I know the reviews were generally unfavorable – I can see how the TV variety show conceit could get old quickly – but nevertheless I loved what I saw; certainly much more than what I've seen of Wonderland, How to Succeed, and Priscilla, and others.
http://www.playbill.com/multimedia/video/4573.html If I were to see Wonderland, it would be the fourth New York production of an Alice in Wonderland adaptation. One was a very faithful straight-play version of “Alice in Wonderland” starring Kate Burton which was awful for one reason because the actors were so muffled by their masks and costumes they couldn't heard, and it had all the bounce of a funeral. The next was the Elizabeth Swados' treatment of “Alice” at the Public starring Meryl Streep which I saw several times and LOVED, and then there was one of the most atrocious flops I ever witnessed, “But Never Jam Today,” which just be the nadir of awful “Alice” adapations.
For “Wonderland,” it's clear from the video that everyone is doing all they can to make the material work, but the premise and execution just seem wrong. I know the creative team has worked a lot on the show since leaving Florida, but in the end it's still Wonderland, warts and all.
I suppose the most positive thing I can say about what I've seen of Wonderland (besides the talented cast) is that it certainly challenges Charles Isherwood's essay in today's edition of The New York Times about the lack of strong voices on Broadway.
Updated On: 4/14/11 at 08:45 PM