Ah it happens pretty much each year but I'm talking about shows that really deserved to win but somehow didn't?
For example-In 1991 The Will Rogers Follies beat Miss Saigon, Once On This Island, and The Secret Garden (three musicals that have great songs, memorable characters, and powerful stories) and really should've won......also IMO Avenue Q hands down deserved that award in 2004
Some other shows that deserved the win
Dreamgirls lost to Nine in 1982
Chicago lost to A Chorus Line in 1976
Sunday In The Park With George lost to La Cage Aux Folles in 1984
Next To Normal losing to Billy Elliot seemed to upset a good number of people. But they got their revenge when Kinky Boots beat Matilda, which I also see as one of the worst Tony losses in recent memory. (Then again, I also think Great Comet, Come From Away, and Groundhog Day are superior musicals to Dear Evan Hansen, so will anyone care about my thoughts?)
Dear Evan Hansen deserved Best Musical. It baffles me that there are actually people who think Come From Away and Groundhog Day are better musicals than Dear Evan Hansen. The Great Comet is equally as great as Dear Evan Hansen, IMO, but it isn't as accessible to some, which is why it didn't leave the Tonys with more love (definitely deserved score, book, and orchestrations). Dear Evan Hansen was both a critical and a huge financial success. Those kinds shows should be awarded.
Shows that ACTUALLY deserved to win Best Musical:
Follies over Two Gentlemen of Verona
Sunday in the Park with George over La Cage Aux Folles (even though I love it)
Next to Normal over Billy Elliot
Matilda over Kinky Boots
Caroline, or Change over Avenue Q
West Side Story over The Music Man
Gypsy over The Sound of Music and Fiorello!
Edit:
Ragtime over The Lion King
Spelling Bee or The Light in the Piazza over Spamalot
^ Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, mate, even if you find it baffling. I personally thought DEH was superior only to Groundhog Day, and would've preferred either TGC or CFA. But that's just my opinion. I can understand why DEH won. Nothing baffling about it.
Anywho:
- Gypsy should've won.
- Matilda should've won over Kinky Boots.
- SITPWG over LCAF.
Also: while I love N2N dearly and am not a fan of Billy Elliot at all, I still think Billy Elliot should've won Best Musical. N2N had the superior score/orchestrations by far imo, but overall I think BE was a more impressive production (that also had a very timely message like N2N!), even if I'm not personally a fan.
Next to Normal and Great Comet are the two that bother me the most. Neither got their due from the Tonys for being innovative and original, losing to what I consider to be rather bland and basic shows and in Hansen's case, actually poorly constructed. I agree with others in that this is the one case I can remember where my least favorite of the nominees won.
At least the former got the Pulitzer Prize though.
CoolDogeGuy - Are you just being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian? I'm having trouble believing that you think the Tony has consistently gone to the worst nominee every year since 2004.
I prefer to look at this as not "who should have won in a particular year" but rather,what are the best shows that didn't win the Tony Award for Best Musical.
On that list: I'm not saying these should have won their season!
I think Great Comet is a better overall production than Dear Evan Hansen, but Dear Evan Hansen has a better story and Come From Away just had a great message. It really should have been a split between the three.
I like Next to Normal, but Billy Elliot just seemed far more intriguing. I also think Shrek is superior to both shows.
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
In recent memory, the only really egregious one in my opinion was Billy Elliot winning over next to normal.
I would also say that in 1988, Into the Woods should have beaten Phantom.
And while this may be unpopular, I firmly believe Ragtime is a far superior show to The Lion King (which I quite enjoy, but it's not in the same league as Ragtime).
Historically, the fact that neither West Side Story nor Gypsy won Best Musical is quite astounding.
adamgreer said: "In recent memory, the only really egregious one in my opinion was Billy Elliot winning over next to normal.
I would also say that in 1988, Into the Woods should have beaten Phantom.
And while this may be unpopular, I firmly believe Ragtime is a far superior show to The Lion King (which I quite enjoy, but it's not in the same league as Ragtime).
Historically, the fact that neither West Side Story nor Gypsy won Best Musical is quite astounding.
I second that. Like the Lion King, but Ragtime should have won the Tony.
I still believe Grey Gardens should have won over Spring Awakening. I'm still pretty bitter about it.
"This table, he is over one hundred years old. If I could, I would take an old gramophone needle and run it along the surface of the wood. To hear the music of the voices. All that was said." - Doug Wright, I Am My Own Wife
adamgreer said: "In recent memory, the only really egregious one in my opinion was Billy Elliot winning over next to normal.
I would also say that in 1988, Into the Woods should have beaten Phantom.
And while this may be unpopular, I firmly believe Ragtime is a far superior show to The Lion King (which I quite enjoy, but it's not in the same league as Ragtime).
Historically, the fact that neither West Side Story nor Gypsy won Best Musical is quite astounding.
There is no accounting for taste. I agree with everything you said, with one exception. I have seen Into The Woods 3 or 4 times and have hated it every time. I kept going back thinking that 'this production will do the trick'. I have finally concluded that, while there are a few songs that I like, I hate the score -- the title song is absolutely my most hated title song or Sondheim song ever, mainly due to the number of times it was reprised in the show -- and that is not going to change; and, if you like / love most Sondheim musicals, and hate the score of one of them, chances are that you are not going to change your mind after all these years. Sacrilege: I have seen the movie and have enjoyed it because I love the basic premise, but I have fast forwarded through some of the songs (and some have been eliminated as well).
Also, while it is far from perfect, I think that Phantom has gotten a bum wrap over the years. There is some beautiful music, there are some very clever patter songs, and the staging is one of the greatest I have seen for a musical in 50 years of theatre attendance. I remember getting goosebumps three or four times the first time I saw the show...something that has rarely if ever been equalled; and those moments were contributed equally by ALW and Prince, e.g., the title song when the candles rise out of the water (forget logic and think stage moment) and the organ is reaching its crescendo; Masquerade, when you realize that half the people on stage are dummies, yet you are still pulled into the magic; and etc. So, I think it definitely deserved its Tony, independent of ITW.
-- Follies losing to 2 Gentlemen (an overpraised bore, although a lot of folks would say that was also true of Follies)
-- Gypsy losing to SOM (at least SO had an incredible score, if not in the same league as Gypsy)
-- Ragtime losing to The Lion King (I wonder what would have happened if Circle of Life had not opened the show...a great opening to an incredibly well-staged show with a lousy score)
-- Chicago losing to A Chorus Line. I admit that I never thought ACL was a great musical, just a very professional one; I thought the Fosse Chicago was considerably better than the current version, although I am delighted that it ended up with the recognition it should have had 20 years earlier