Posted: 9/5/24 at 9:49pm
Yesterday’s horrifying school shooting got me thinking about ANNIE GET YOUR GUN. The show has a wonderful collection of songs, but feels like one of the rare once-major shows that we aren’t going to see revived on a large scale.
Not, of course, because of the show’s gender politics, or treatment of Indigenous characters, or the fact that Annie was 15 when she met the years-older Frank Butler, or the fact that the real Frank was an Irishman portrayed as an all-American cowboy. Those things are all fixable, and irrelevant to this conversation.
The problem is, at the show’s core is a celebration of gun-wielding. When hundreds of innocent children and adults die from guns every year, to produce AGYG feels blatantly irresponsible. Sarna Lapine's version at Bay Street tried to fix some problems, but Oakley was a product of her time in the 1800s, the show was a product of the 1940s, and now times are different...and aside from some terrific songs and feisty gender wars, the show has never been that great.
AGYG feels like one of those “to depict is to endorse” situations. “Children will listen,” and we cannot trust some parents to teach responsible gun ownership after taking their kids to see the Annie Oakley musical! Obviously I'm not saying that guns shouldn't appear on stage or on screen: it's just that this particular show centers them in an unavoidable way that adds no positives but many negatives to the cultural conversation. It might be nice if we could all fully disassociate from reality while at a show, but we can't.
The show COULD be produced –– and it does, in amateur & regional theatres –– but I cannot think of a reason why it SHOULD be.
Thoughts? Am I overreacting to innocent children being killed and the theatre's impact on society?
Updated On: 9/5/24 at 09:49 PM