The Vulture article sums it up. I also thought his foundation was alarming from day one. Overall, it’s egregious. Studios, producers, and creative consultants are notorious for giving notes from day one. Anyone who couldn’t see this needs to be fired. I believe their hands were tied and they were on a burning runaway train.
Me thinks Mr. Platt had very tight creative control and there was a cease and desist on giving “the Tony winner who created the role” any notes. He wanted the perm, he wanted to be uber thin, he wanted the pancake makeup to cover up his hirsute face. I sense he took the project very seriously so I’m not saying he’s unprofessional. I’m just saying he needed someone trustworthy to intervene and it clearly didn’t happen. Maybe a lot of “yes” people on the project.
I saw the show during previews and there two men in the back of the theatre discussing the show. I was unsure if they were connected to the show or not but they didn’t sit during the show and leaned against the back wall. I heard one saw, “Michael had to fight tooth and nail to get him to stop all the twitching. Thank god he did. He was acting like Leo in Gilbert Grape. It was very distracting.” Maybe he’s a method actor and no one stepped in to shape his appearance.
I also don’t know why he’s choosing to look like a 40 year old 70s folk singer on the press junket. It’s not helping his case.
"The sexual energy between the mother and son really concerns me!"-random woman behind me at Next to Normal
"I want to meet him after and bang him!"-random woman who exposed her breasts at Rock of Ages, referring to James Carpinello