Was just sitting here, thinking that I have not anymore news about "Follies" being made into a film. My thought of who could possibly make it happen would be casting Barbra Streisand as Sally. I am very sure that her performance of "Losing My Mind", would win her her third Oscar and be a pefect final film for her to be in...
Since this is a dream casting, I'm also going to assume that "One More Kiss" doesn't get cut, and they get one of the great opera singers like Teresa Stratas to come out of retirement to play Heidi.
Sally is 49-50. Streisand is 81, and with a limited voice these days. That glorious voice she once had is sadly not there anymore. It’s painful hearing her attempt any high note these days. You’re thinking it’s 1982 and she’s 40 years old.
Why not just forward the timeline. Some of those you mentioned can still portray the roles. Just have it be 2023 rather than 1971. Would be very exciting to have octagenarians portray the roles. Granted “Whos That Woman would have to be simplified but have the “Ghosts” do most of the dancing But how thrilling it would be see 14 old dames descend the staircase in “Beautiful Girls”. Throw in Dolly Parton and Jane Fonda and other Glamor Girls from the past. Just don’t have Rob Marshall direct. As for the male roles…..anyone want to cast them?
Many (most?) of these suggestions are truly unhinged. Sadly, many of the ladies being suggested can barely walk, let alone sing, dance and sashay down a staircase!
I think this could make a wonderful art film. And I completely agree on some of this casting. Make it a tribute to the modern legends. : Julie andrews. Carol Burnett. Bette midler. Cher. Barbra. Streep pfieffer
49 years old in 1970 is very different to 49 in 2021. It would be fine for someone to be 60 years old imo. Or even a bit older depending on how they look. The tone in general of the show does need people who look and feel like they’ve gone through a lot. I also hope they insist to cast a Sally who can sing (minimum standard Staunton and that’s MINIMUM. Bernadette was stronger). Or they dub the vocals with Kelli O’Hara or something. Enough is enough.
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
binau said: "49 years old in 1970 is very different to 49 in 2021. It would be fine for someone to be 60 years old imo. Or even a bit older depending on how they look. The tone in general of the show does need people who look and feel like they’ve gone through a lot. I also hope they insist to cast a Sally who can sing (minimum standard Staunton and that’s MINIMUM. Bernadette was stronger). Or they dub the vocals with Kelli O’Hara or something. Enough is enough."
Exactly. We all know the ladies on And Just Like That are the same age as The Golden Girls. If you were to make a new Golden Girls for 2023, you absolutely need to cast older.
This is also a conversation we've had about plays like Streetcar, where Stanley is 25 and Blanche almost a lost-cause at 30. Ages meant different things 40, 50, 75 years ago.
The point of FOLLIES isn't that the characters are decrepid. It's really not an arguement that '49 looked different in 1972.' The point is that the characters are at a life crossroads where the POSSIBILITY of what they wanted when they were young still glimmers with some (perhaps delussional) hope. We should believe that there is a space for Sally and Ben to be together - that there is still possibility (i.e. they are still young enough) to have a second life together.
I think some of you are also forgetting that actors like Renee Zelwegger, Cate Blanchet and Hugh Jackman are all in their mid 50s now. Sharon Stone is 65. Bette Midler is 77. These are the correct ages to cast the roles (and in fact older than the original actors who created the roles by half a dozen years).
“I knew who I was this morning, but I've changed a few times since then.”
This is also a conversation we've had about plays like Streetcar, where Stanley is 25 and Blanche almost a lost-cause at 30. Ages meant different things 40, 50, 75 years ago."
Yes, but in casting Blanche as a 50 year old, not only is it contrary to what Williams wrote, it robs us of the tragedy of the story, which is tied to a specific time and place. What is wrong with an audience today seeing a Blanche who is 30 and per the time and place, considered no longer desirable as a woman because of her age? Not everything regarding age needs to be brought up to current viewpoints of age in order to be resonant or powerful storytelling.
“I knew who I was this morning, but I've changed a few times since then.”
"The point is that the characters are at a life crossroads where the POSSIBILITY of what they wanted when they were young still glimmers with some (perhaps delussional) hope. We should believe that there is a space for Sally and Ben to be together - that there is still possibility (i.e. they are still young enough) to have a second life together"
Yes I agree the possibility needs to be there but my reading of the material personally is it's kind of very much last/desperate hope because of their age and life circumstances, especially Sally (which is what makes the material for me so relentless and devastating). It's the 'final chance' for all of them to get what they want before it's too late and essential resign to waiting it out until death. I genuinely think in 2023 because we are much healthier, have a better quality of life (in theory) and healthcare, we look younger and live longer (e.g. US females can expect to live almost 10 years longer I think now?) that we don't need to worry about casting 49 year olds. In fact, I think we need to be careful not to cast a Sally that looks as good as many people do close to that age do today (e.g. Kelli O'Hara, Sutton Foster etc.)...otherwise at least for me it lowers the stakes a little. Ok if I saw Kelli walk off the stage right now sure she lost the guy but she has so much ahead of her to look forward to. When Bernadette walked off the stage completely hopeless it was devastating because it really felt like she tried and failed to get her dream (Ben), and you really did question what the rest of her life would be like (if she even chose to live). "Oh dear god, it is tomorrow". Had Bernadette performed the role in the 90s when SHE was 49 years old, except that her voice would have been in a much better state to handle the material, again I would really wonder if the tone would be 'lost the guy' instead of 'lost my life'.
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000