GYPSY Previews — Page 8

KitKatBoy24 said: "I’m glad you enjoyed her performance and you bring up a lot of interesting critiques and points. I, however, don’t agree that all voice types are fit for all scores. Just like all instruments aren’t fit for all songs. Imagine if Gypsy’s score was played on only cowbells and clarinets. Or Rent was played without a single electric guitar or drum set.Audra is obviously an incredible vocalist, this is not a discredit to her talent. But a lot of people are going to find her voice to be very awkward on this score"

I understand how many people will be turned off by her voice in this score. I could be bias because I'm also a fan of operatic styles of singing. From my time spent in watching performances of great opera singers, I've seen them take music and attain the gravitas expected in vocal strength and phrasing typical or Rose. Just because the voice sounds different doesn't mean it can't positively contribute to the entire role. Think of songs that have been covered the most. Several types of voices and amazing vocal abilities lead to many popular versions. With that said, I'd hope people go in without expectations of Rose's typical vocal sound in the score. If you do then you're already shutting yourself down to her performance and what she's bringing, not subtracting.

 

TLDR- Don't spend your money on performances you've decided already won't be good. 

Jebus. This thread is insane. It’s like the election all over again. Pass the bloody popcorn.

Auggie27 said: "I much appreciate thehighlydetailed postings on where they determine the McDonald Rose misfires, in conception and early execution. They are thoughtful, carefully considered, and in every way analytical. I don't find any disrespectful of the artists orartistry. A great theatrical treasure McDonald certainly is; but this is a public forum- and I've been here two decades - that welcomes discussion of dissenting takes. It's always been a reliable place to get early responses to new productions. I especially savor the genuinely nuanced deconstructions of what was witnessed. In a world where everything is "amazing!" or not, the evaluations of directorial intentionand actor choices are particularly valuable. The posters clearly know that a preview period is designed for adjustments and outright corrections. Yet we get post after post explaining that fundamental, as if passing on a revelation.

To all of these points:it's hypocritical to arrive here circa 10:30 - 11:30 on the night of a first preview and troll - and then scold- posters fresh from the performance who wish to share measured first impressions. If the practice offends, be consistent and stay away until a subjectively determined point when a show seems "ready" for appraisal. I learned a great deal this morning about the directorial prism on the piece and the star's approach to a classical role. Such information is foundational to this board, and I applaud and thank those who shared so fully."

Very well said. Thank you

 

MemorableUserName said: "TheOnlyOne2 said: "Danny Burstein was solid,and there was great chemistry between the three of them. The "Best Actor" category won't be a blood bath like "Best Actress". A nom would make sense but I don't see a Tony."

Maybe this is what you meant, but Herbie is traditionally a role nominated in Featured Actor (it's tied for the role most nominated in that category, though only one of the four nominated has won), so Burstein would likely be considered there. (Not saying if that makes his chances for awin better or worse.)"

Ahhh ok, I didn't know it would be counted as featured. 

Clearly anyone who posts negatively about McDonald is going to be accused of "microagressive" behavior, so I'm out.  Others have pointed out the issues with the production - some of which might be fixed in previews, but many of which feel like basic directorial misfires. Maybe you really did need a Mama Rose monster of a person at the level of Arthur Laurents directing, because this is the least effective production of GYPSY I've seen on Broadway, and that isn't entirely because of the performance at the center of it.   

For those of you commenting on the huge disparity in reactions to McDonald's performance - I offer that it is possible for someone of McDonald's gifts to give a talented, well crafted performance that is also completely wrong for the role and completely at odds with the script and score (which is ultimately what I think she does).  Last night, Audra already showed signs of vocal fatigue, and I hope she is going to be up to doing 8 shows a week for however long this production lasts.

pagereynolds said: "Play Esq. said: "It was a first preview. Cut her some damn slack."

No. Her’s was a perfectly fine performance, for someone who isn’t Audra. Enjoy your perfectly fine performance and come back and tell us how much you enjoyed it."

This person either wasn't there or has some sort of vendetta. Good lord."

This person was there and has worshipped at the shrine of Audra for well over 20 years.  No one was disappointed by last night more than me. 

Updated On: 11/22/24 at 09:02 AM

It's bizarre that they would stage a production of a classic show that has been done umpteen times just so one particular actress could have her day.

My lucky number is seven; It might as well be Audra’s now.

ljay889 said: "House lights on for most of the overture was a choice. The audience talked throughout.
Her characterization is really great, but her classical signing doesn’t always match her character. She got it right for “Roses” though.

Sets are mostly cheap looking, not unlike the 08 revival.
Lots of new dance arrangements. A new intro to Small World I’ve never heard before.
They used the dance break for You’ll Never Get Away From Me, I believe from the Lansbury revival. It wasn’t needed.

Mr. Kringaline has returned, but they cut the “faux rape” moment.

Jordan Tyson is a standout with a completely over the top June.
"

Totally separately, does anyone know if there's any recording or any documentation at all of where that Small World intro came from or anywhere else that it's been included in a production? I was also surprised last night and hadn't ever heard it before.

binau said: "Sorry I know odd to focus on this but I was looking forward to the Gypsy overture and yet they started with the lights on and everyone talked over it. What the ****? Did they just run out of time and start playing it as they had no other option?"

I was there last night. When the overture starts my immediate thought was “oh they ran out of time and could not wait any more” some around me were still getting seated. The girl next to me was so annoyed by other people talking and yelled a “shut up” but she then later made the most noises in the audience (hysterical laughter/ jumping in her seat / some of the loudest coughing I’ve ever heard through out the 3.5 hours) 

 

anyway, thinking if they continue doing this tonight then it’s possible that it’s by choice ?

binau said: "Sorry I know odd to focus on this but I was looking forward to the Gypsy overture and yet they started with the lights on and everyone talked over it. What the ****? Did they just run out of time and start playing it as they had no other option?"

I found the audience last night to be so rude. Talking over the Overture and Entr’acte and the people behind me were acting as if they were at a drag shows - yelling “werk,” “eat it up,” and countless “YAAAASes” throughout the entire show. It was very frustrating trying to focus and take in what is very much a work-in-progress with clear eyes and an open mind when people are actively screaming throughout the show.

Updated On: 11/22/24 at 10:42 AM