Jordan Catalano said: "OOOOOOOK, so let's talk.
Back at the hotel after the show tonight. There's a lot to really like here - A LOT. My biggest fear has been the show wouldn't land the tone of the film (as I described before) but it really doesn't matter here since the musicals' Helen & Madeline are not Meryl and Goldie's in any way. They're their own things and that's for the best because it frees them of need to live up to the film. It's clear very fast that's what they're doing and it lets you just sit back and enjoy. Act One is VERY VERY funny with some scream-out-loud one liners and jokes. Hilty is fabulous but Simard is the one who surprised me most here. She's her usual dry hilarious self but it's more contained/restrained than I've ever seen her and she plays it perfectly. Most of the changes they made really work (Hell, I didn't even miss the frosting in the can!) and again just lets you enjoy this without comparing it to the film.
So let's talk about what didn't work for me (and there will be spoilers in here that I'm sure have been discussed earlier but I dunno). I'll start with the Act One opening. Opening with Michelle Williams doing a song about the potion is pointless. We don't need a whole song and dance about what it is and what it does - we know. That's why we're here. Even if you don't know, you'll find out soon enough. It's awful and needs to be cut. While we're talking about Williams, none of it with her is working. And it's really not her fault. She seemed fine up there tonight but her character is entirely overused and everything that comes out of her mouth is horribly written. The role is little more than a cameo and needs to be kept that way, there's no point for her being onstage so much other than she's Michelle Williams.
The other big thing that doesn't really work (yet) is act two. There's a lot of reasons why this is unsuccessful and I'm sure I'll be able to articulate more later but just want to get my initial thoughts down right now. Act One ends after the push down the stairs - done excellently. Picking it up after that there's not a LOT left to the story which is why Act Two is about 35minutes shorter than Act One. But one of the things that made the film so excitingwas the special effects and yes I know this is a stage show but we kind of don't get much of anything besides the prosthetic neck and a "hole" (no smoke came out tonight) that's just a black circle of cloth? There's also a song with Chris Sieber (who's otherwise great) in a tool shed trying to think of a way to keep them looking young that (for me) was probably the weakest of the night complete with talking paint cans.
So yeah, there's a lot to work on but this is far from "Devil Wears Prada" where the script needed to be burned and redone from scratch."
I've seen it twice now. First time, first preview, with a fairly negative reaction and review here. A few days later, with better seats, sightlines and sound, and some settling in of the cast, I am leaning much more positive, and agree with just about everything Jordan says here. The only difference is that I wish that, rather than reducing the role of Viola, they could find a way to make it better, maybe with her somewhat as a narrator or maybe an outside commenting observer, with better dialogue and songs. It's too promising of a character in the right hands to lose. There are really only four characters in the show, and cutting 25% would be a shame.