Sorry, henrik, when I asked that question, I was assuming you had read what I read upthread about the new ending. (We got it again a couple posts later, in a more fleshed-out version.) Whether or not it "works" is, of course, entirely subjective... but personally I'm not really interested in that. What most people are objecting to is the principle, the ethics, and motivation behind making any changes at all.
I'm actually finding a little disturbing the suggestion that people may find this ending "more fulfilling." What's fulfilling? As my brother used to tell me, "Just because it feels good doesn't mean it's right."
On paper, this new PORGY ending sounds like it may allow theatergoes to go "Rah rah rah" on the way out the door, but that doesn't really change my opinion of the tampering. The possibility that it's dumbed-down offends me, but the fact that it's happened at all worries me.
CHURCH DOOR TOUCAN GAY MARKETING PUPPIES MUSICAL THEATER STAPLES PERIOD OIL BITCHY SNARK HOLES