La La Land — Page 5

the plot is also clearly not the point of the film

I'm a voting member of the WGA, and just got the interim published screenplay to accompany the screener. Trust me, the story is -- on it's own terms -- intricately plotted, scene by scene. Dismissing the story is anyone's prerogative, based on personal experience; but it's not the filmmakers, who want the screenwriting to stand alone. So yes, the writing, and yes, the plot mattered plenty to those who prepped the film. And yes, wrote it. Members of the WGA - writers, all -- are not asked to read and vote for cinematography, art direction, choreography, or musical treatment. We're asked to evaluate and vote for the story.

So Auggie ( while NOT asking u how u will vote) do u think the screenplay will get nominated for a WGA?

It's sad that Debbie Reynolds passed away today. Her work in the film, Singin' in the Rain, is sublime.

For all of you who commented on the "gorgeous dance sequences" in La La Land, why don't you take a look at Singin' again. The dance sequences in that musical are stunning and luckily preserved forever on film . They're lit beautifully, the actors have musical talent, the score is top-notch and the choreography is glorious. There is nothing in "Slumber-land" that comes close. Absolutely Nothing.

Updated On: 12/28/16 at 11:48 PM

There is nothing in "Slumber-land" that comes close.

I don't believe the goal was to try & equal those Days of Glory musical films . I think it uses them as a frame of reference and then evolves into it's own being. and in it's own way it's wonderful.

Trish2 said: "It's sad that Debbie Reynolds passed away today. Her work in the film, Singin' in the Rain, is sublime.

For all of you who commented on the "gorgeous dance sequences" in La La Land, why don't you take a look at Singin' again. The dance sequences in that musical are stunning and luckily preserved forever on film . They're lit beautifully, the actors have musical talent, the score is top-notch and the choreography is glorious. There is nothing in "Slumber-land" that comes close. Absolutely Nothing."



Extremely classy of you to use Ms. Reynolds' passing as an excuse to be snarky about the film.

Updated On: 12/29/16 at 12:47 AM

sabrelady said: "There is nothing in "Slumber-land" that comes close.

I don't believe the goal was to try & equal those Days of Glory musical films . I think it uses them as a frame of reference and then evolves into it's own being. and in it's own way it's wonderful.

Exactly my thoughts. I never once thought this was a true musical but it used that premise to tell a story. The actors singing and dancing could not compare with yesteryears movie musical talents, but their efforts reminded me of that era and it was so welcomed. Sometimes a reminder of simple pleasures helps lift some of ugliness of today.

Ado Annie D'Ysquith said: "Unrelated, but mc1227, I hope you absolutely try to catch Cagney again. It's such a lovely show and the people involved are both uber talented AND total sweethearts.

I was so disappointed at not being able to attend and hope to catch it before it closes.



"

THE MUPPETS-- all live action (albeit with Muppets) and mostly original songs, 2 of which were nominated for Oscars.

I just saw this tonight and - as a big old nerd about musicals- really? That's what everyone has been going gaga over? I didn't hate it at all, but it was the most thoroughly "fine" movie I've seen in a while. Spoilers below, for those who care.

My main issues with the film are plot ones- I think Damien Chazelle understands how to film a musical, but I don't think he's written a very good one. Mia and Sebastian's first dance in the parking lot is charming, but it's completely unearned. These characters have exchanged a total of what, five lines at this point? In musicals the songs and dances generally make up some emotional ground, but there has to be a little bit of scene happening first. In this case, the dance feels unearned- and then when there's a similar sequence at the Planetarium, it feels redundant. You can get away with a little slack character development in a musical, but here there's virtually none.

Furthermore, the one substantial scene the two of them have together- the fight over dinner- doesn't make a lick of sense. Why, when Sebastian has apparently been on the road for at least a few weeks, is Mia just asking how long the tour is? And two people working in the entertainment industry never contemplated having a long distance relationship before? Their entire conversation doesn't read like a conversation between two people who have been in the business for a while- it's immature on both sides.

The last sequence is, of course, lovely. But we've barely gotten to know these characters or seen them together in their very brief relationship, so I didn't find that I had any emotional connection. Both actors sell it as best they can, but I was pretty unmoved- the film doesn't set up the emotional ground for the sequence to really pack the punch it should.

Both actors are generally very good, with Stone faring better due to the sheer force of her personality and because Gosling's character is often kind of an ass. The singing, however, is pretty disappointing. When you're making a musical of, say, Into the Woods, I expect the singing to be less than perfect, because the score exists and it's already difficult. But this whole thing was (I assume) crafted around the two of them, and that's the best they could do? Gosling really just isn't a very good singer at all, but during "Audition", Stone shows off a much stronger lower register. So why choose to write all of her songs in a higher ranger where she doesn't sound as good?

I truly wanted to fall in love with this, but it's a very pretty bunch of nothing. It seems like it's probably going to win Best Picture over Moonlight, which is a real shame- Moonlight is superior in basically every way and doesn't show us a tired story that we've seen for decades now.

I saw the movie last night, and loved it. I thought the acting was top notch. I am a big fan of the score. The plot is thin, yes, but I got past that. I felt a strong emotional connection to the characters. I thought the cinematography was great as well.

I thought many times Moonlight would be a better movie and make more sense if none of the characters were black. I thought many times Fences would be a better and make more sense if none of the characters were black.

I thought many times Moana would be better movie if it took place in Iowa.

icecreambenjamin said: "I agree. We should never cast white actors ever again.



"

Why are you getting so defensive? Given the way the male lead part was written, it kinda lends itself to be played by a black man. It just makes sense, looking at it from a jazz history standpoint. They're also in 2016 LA, a city with a more than prevalent POC presence. It doesn't help that Ryan Gosling isn't the best singer thus appearing to have been cast just to have an A list celeb. Black folks have had a lot stolen from them and the least that could have happened was giving a role about guy trying to save jazz to someone who belonged to the community that created the artform in the first place.