MCfan2 said: "Dancingthrulife2 said: "I really wish it would be filmed with Ambrose in it. Her nuanced performance is a breath of fresh air that the show desperately needs if it wants to persuade the broaderaudience that golden age musicals are still worth going back to and digging into. "
The show has survived for 62 years. I think it'll be just fine.
And anyway, having now seen Ambrose in the role, I frankly don't think her nuance added all that much. I'm not slamming her in the least. She was excellent and I enjoyed her performance very much. But honestly, I didn't think she was the transcendent and transformativeeighth wonder of the world that BWW had led me to expect.
I've seen many very good actresses playing this role; she was just one more of them. It almost seems like many people forgot that Eliza was a great role to begin with."
Eliza is a great role, and one of the reasons that it is great is that if you dig into it you’ll see Eliza is not what people might have believed she is. Very few actresses who played Eliza that I’ve seen realized that Eliza wasn’t really transformed by Higgins; she wanted to behave “proper” and she asked him for a lesson, starting her own transformation. She’s never not a tasteless “guttersnipe” that Higgins thought she was. And in Loverly, one of the most important moments in the show to set the tone for the journey, she isn’t just complaining nor daydreaming, but she’s figuring out what she wants for herself, showing the audience her agency along with the warmth of the community. Ambrose did all that and I’m grateful she and Sher translated that interpretation into what I consider to be such a marvelous performance. Ambrose might not have the best vocals out there, but that interpretation to me is invaluable and essential to this production. I’m not saying Benanti is not going to be great in the musical, but she wouldn’t be the first person I think of to cast in Sher’s My Fair Lady.