She actually thinks the same. She has this ongoing joke where she'll look at her headshot from the beginning of her career and call herself fifty five, or the like. I still don't see her age being an issue, though. It's never explicitly stated or even implied, really, that she's super young. If she was greying or looked incredibly aged, then it would be an issue, but I can't see why she couldn't play Eliza. Playing the Devils Advocate though, Osnes would be a great and thrilling choice as well. There are many actresses in New York who could hypothetically do this.
They/them.
"Get up the nerve to be all you deserve to be."
I can only answer your question with my personal opinion, but I find that, onstage, Osnes just has a "quality". What I appreciate most about her performances is her innate earnestness. She is just believable regardless of contrived situation or hokey dialogue. I think her soprano is lovely, light, and shimmering but agree it doesn't have the depth and versatility of the many brilliant vocalists you mentioned. What she does also have though is a clear, pure belt, and is an excellent (and more importantly, expressive) dancer. Couple all of this together and I find that, often, you can't take your eyes off her.
Very excited about the prospect of a first-class MFL revival and thank any of the wonderful actresses discussed could be great. I do think Ms. Benanti's comedic and dramatic versatility matched with that stunner of a voice just smacks of perfect casting. Exciting regardless!
We have (and I applaud) racially diverse casts, gender bending casts, but someone we are stuck on someone looking too old? Really? Suspend belief for a Mama Rose in her 70's who is a woman of color, but not someone who may be 10 years too 'old'?
While I don't think it's crazy for a woman in her late-thirties (or, god forbid, older!) to play Eliza, I don't think a "name" is needed for a revival of My Fair Lady, especially if a well-known actor is secured for Higgins.
(and for the record, if Andrew Rannells and Gavin Creel can play the 19-year-old Elder Price in Mormon without people huffing at it, Benanti can play the early-twenties Eliza).
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Kad said: "(and for the record, if Andrew Rannells and Gavin Creel can play the 19-year-old Elder Price in Mormon without people huffing at it, Benanti can play the early-twenties Eliza)."
That's where the misogyny and double standards come in!
They/them.
"Get up the nerve to be all you deserve to be."
I don't think age is an issue at all. Especially on the stage it seems so much less important than on film, and casting people often seem to pay very little attention to it. I mean, both Kristin and Idina were already in their 30s when they did Wicked, and those characters are 18-ish, at least in Act 1. And that's just one example, Kad mentioned another, and I'm sure there are countless more.
I can only answer your question with my personal opinion, but I find that, onstage, Osnes just has a "quality". What I appreciate most about her performances is her innate earnestness. She is just believable regardless of contrived situation or hokey dialogue. I think her soprano is lovely, light, and shimmering but agree it doesn't have the depth and versatility of the many brilliant vocalists you mentioned. What she does also have though is a clear, pure belt, and is an excellent (and more importantly, expressive) dancer. Couple all of this together and I find that, often, you can't take your eyes off her. "
Thanks, s_d_l. I had forgotten that she received an Astaire nomination for "Anything Goes." I didn't see her in Encores' Pipe Dream, but I downloaded the live sound recording and again she impressed me as very versatile.
Maybe I answered my own question about how the people in power see her or should see her. She played Nellie for the last eight months of South Pacific, through the winter and the summer, and that show ran out for over 1000 performances. Someone must have liked her.
The Australian revival of My Fair Lady is supposed to open at the Sydney Opera House on August 30th. That production is going the way of the established British star, Alex Jennings, a three time Olivier winner, as Higgins and relatively unknown Australian born Anna O'Rourke as Liza.
Anna is thirty years old and seems most like Kelli O'Hara in being a hard-working actress, moving from show to next show. She has been touring the UK as Sarah in Guys and Dolls and will head back to Sydney for this MFL kick-off.
This 60th anniversary production is only selling tickets through October, calling itself a "strictly limited presentation." If that is the case it will surely transfer or tour. (Make that probably transfer or tour since I'm not a member of the intelligentsia.) If there is a Broadway revival this year (60th Anniversary), it will surely be compared to the Aussie production, which of course is being directed by Dame Julie Andrews.
Is the Chicago Lyric opera production a wholly different production? Is it based on any previous incarnations?
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
I have no idea if she could possibly sing it, probably not in her range, but Scher fave Lauren Ambrose otherwise strikes me as a very cool choice for Eliza - in Pygmalion anyway.
Call_me_jorge said: "Is the Chicago Lyric opera production a wholly different production? Is it based on any previous incarnations?"
Lyric stages the American debut of a grand production from Théâtre du Châtelet and director Robert Carsen, featuring sets by Tim Hatley and costumes by Anthony Powell. “If there is a theater outside the English-speaking world where productions of American musical comedies equal or surpass those of Broadway, the Théâtre du Châtelet is it,” raves The New York Times. - See more at: https://www.lyricopera.org/concertstickets/calendar/2016-2017/productions/lyricopera/my-fair-lady#sthash.t0rzlkHQ.dpuf
I haven't found what the intentions are for the Australian production after it's done Australia, but with two major world productions of the musical already in place, with one directed by Dame Andrews herself, I'm inclined to think that Broadway will pass on a new revival this year.
The lyric also put up the Théâtre du Châtelet's production of the King and I just this past year.
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
Call_me_jorge said: "The lyric also put up the Théâtre du Châtelet's production of the King and I just this past year."
That would have been interesting to see.
Some Chicagoans are unhappy that the Lyric Opera has been resorting to musicals to garner enough income to be able to keep the "high-brow" entertainment financed.
OK, back to potential Lincoln Center Elizas. I guess Sutton Foster would be a non-starter.
I'm still rooting for Laura Benanti all the way, but I was listening to Daddy Long Legs again last night and was thinking that Megan McGinnis could be a fabulous Eliza! She has a superb soprano voice and I think you could act the part as well. There's a fierceness under her sweetness that would suit Eliza.
OlBlueEyes said: "The Australian revival of My Fair Lady is supposed to open at the Sydney Opera House on August 30th. That production is going the way of the established British star, Alex Jennings, a three time Olivier winner, as Higgins and relatively unknown Australian born Anna O'Rourke as Liza.
Anna is thirty years old and seems most like Kelli O'Hara in being a hard-working actress, moving from show to next show. She has been touring the UK as Sarah in Guys and Dolls and will head back to Sydney for this MFL kick-off.
This 60th anniversary production is only selling tickets through October, calling itself a "strictly limited presentation." If that is the case it will surely transfer or tour. (Make that probably transfer or tour since I'm not a member of the intelligentsia.) If there is a Broadway revival this year (60th Anniversary), it will surely be compared to the Aussie production, which of course is being directed by Dame Julie Andrews.
I would have said that Alex Jennings is an unknown to Australian audiences whereas Anna O'Byrne is rather a darling of the theatre community (of course, we had Love Never Dies in Melbourne for a lot longer than Sydney and also got to see her as a rather spray-tanned Maria in The Production Company's West Side Story so that may be affecting my opinion!). If the show comes to Melbourne I would be seeing it for her. It doesn't hurt that she is an absolute sweetheart!
They also have names in Eliza's father (played by Reg Livermore, who is very well known, particularly to the older audience) and Freddie (played by Mark Vincent who is one of the few successes of Australia's Got Talent and has an album out with Marina Prior so would be getting exposure with the target audience).
I also don't recall any Australian production NOT being called 'strictly limited', so that really doesn't mean much. However, if it does decently it will at least do a season in Melbourne, provided the Regent is free (no other theatres are) and likely other cities. The only major musicals of recent years that I can think of that didn't were Once (due to theatre availability), Forum (due to Geoffrey Rush availability) and Addams Family (which flopped). All our shows have to tour/transfer (there's really no difference here!) to be successful.