Saw last night's performance. Ran about 2:45.
As has been discussed ad nauseam, the show looks INCREDIBLE - the costumes are stunning, the set and live video effects are incredibly impressive - this is a VERY well produced show.
Block is incredible in the role and I foresee a Tony nomination. The scene where she auditions for Robert Altman - the woman brings the roof down. Teal Wicks is also very strong and sounds the most like Cher of the three leading ladies. I was not as much of a fan of Micaela Diamond, though you can't deny that the girl is going to grow into a massive star. Jarrod Spector was pitch-perfect as Sonny and I predict a Tony nom if not a win. Michael Campayno also really made a terrific impression as Rob Camelleti. They felt to me the show's leading men. Michael Beresse was adorable as Mackie. Emily Skinner made a lovely impression as Georgia, if she was a bit underused. Matthew Hydzik left very little impression.
Act 1 felt like a train wreck and we almost walked out. Glad we didn't because Act 2 was ASTOUNDING. Similarly to Beautiful, the show and material get more interesting as Cher ages into a superstar. And it also helps that Block carries most of Act 2 as she is the strongest actress of the three Chers. Act 2 is also very streamlined as the book scenes are mostly played as an honest memory play, with many scenes rooted in realism (more on that below). Act 1 is totally fixable though.
The big problem with the show is that there are just too many devices. It starts off as a "Cher show within a Cher show" - we're watching Cher shoot a variety retrospective performance of her career...but then, when she finally enters, so do the other two Chers, who then start communicating with each other, and stepping in and out of communicating as one unit to the people with them in a scene (even though we assume that the scene partner can only see one Cher). Additionally, the show drifts into hardcore book scenes with only one Cher present, or two Chers, or all three. And sometimes, other Chers comment on the action in these scenes - which are sometimes played in realism, and other times, feel like they're a sketch within the Cher retrospective we're watching be filmed, and OTHER times, they are played as if a musing or thought in Cher's mind (like when Georgia enters and speaks to all three of them). This makes the show feel convoluted and in fact, flat-out confusing at times. At one point, one of my friends actually expressed out loud - "I truly have no idea what's going on". I think they are doing the work, and getting there - but they need to simplify. The conceit of having the three Chers works- in the end, we get the message "there's Cher in all women - and all women are superstars" - which is a message we need and the emotional through line of the evening. But we don't need the additional device of the "Cher show within a Cher show". There is a ton of buildup to the Chers' entrance(s?) in which the TV crew runs around looking for her and so on and so on - and it's just not necessary - and that device makes the audience question just what exactly is going on in each scene - is this a part of the filming? Is this a memory? Is this a book scene? Just have the three Chers enter, and set up the device that Cher is going to walk us through her life, as three parts of herself, and do the thing as a memory play. It's still very theatrical and we don't need an additional framing device. Otherwise it becomes like Cher inception.
Other small note is that "Bang Bang" is reprised an INCESSANT amount of times and with a catalogue as deep as Cher's, I think the team can find other songs that work rather than doing close to three small reprises of Bang Bang (one or two of which happen before Lady Cher - played by Wicks - gets her big moment singing the song).
Tons of potential with this one though. I could see this becoming a MASSIVE hit by the time it reaches New York.