Posted: 5/15/23 at 3:21pm
ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "B212323 said: "This is squarely on the Broadway League for not getting ahead of this - they did not even try to negotiate with the WGA before the strike was called. It's mind blowing to me that they didn't write material before the strike deadline and just slot in the nominee names. Unfortunately if the Tonys don't air in a timely manner most likely several new shows will close by Labor Day. How they didn't see this was going to be an issue?!"
You seem to be misinformed:
– The League claims the ceremony was pre-written ahead of the strike beginning (meaning, ahead of the noms being announced). Slotting in names is the same as writing the ceremony from scratch with "scabs" or non-union writers. And without cooperation of the WGA, there's going to be inevitable picketing, backlash, a host dropping out, etc.
– The job of a strike is to disrupt.The League's hands were tied and the WGA likely wasn't interested in entertaining convos about compromise ahead of the strike –– just as they weren't interested in making a deal this early in the strike.
– It seems pretty clear the Tonys will happen June 11, televised or not (as a news conference or something else). Shows struggling at the B.O. that don't win would be LUCKY to last til Labor Day. If you're bleeding money, cut your losses as soon as you don't see a bump.
– There has been much talk about "the industry" as a whole being negatively impacted here. But as we know, the Tonys really only benefit a couple of shows a year. The benefits for all others are negligible or nill, and they may incur MORE costs than they'd ever recoup by doing a musical number on a fictional live telecast."
I think your last point is entirely wrong. The awards impact the industry in a monumental way not just what we see on screen but employing so many people from stagehands to dressers to seat fillers to private car drivers, etc. It's a big deal. And the impact will be felt without a telecast.