Sauja said: "Show’s about 2:50. The audience was rapturous. I was…just immensely disappointed. Redmayne was in beautiful voice, but the character felt sort of…goofy. Not sexy, not sinister. Sort of just there. I don’t blame him. For me, the entire evening was a directorial let-down. Buckley seems to have overshot “broken woman” and landed in “deranged.” Can she sing? I don’t know! She can speak the lyrics of “Perfectly Marvelous” in an American accent. She can rhythmically get to the end of the world’s limpest “Mein Herr.” She can whisper then snarl and scream her way through the title song. The audience response was rapturous. I was baffled by the whole thing. Maybe I’ve just been too spoiled by the Mendes version across the years, but this one left me shockingly empty. But! Think I’m going to be in the vast minority on this one."
I was disappointed too. There is a lot to enjoy and the cast is pretty strong. I think the show was let down by the direction: when the book is so episodic you need a strong vision to hold it together, and I think it was often missing. It's definitely a slow burner and it takes a little while to find its footing. I thought it really started to work in the scene that precedes "Perfectly Marvellous", while Willkommen and Sally's first two songs were thrown away. After that it works much better and the crescendo toward the end of act 1 was thrilling.
Act 2, on the whole, is in much better shape, but I found the title song completely cringeworthy. It's not really Jessie Buckley's fault, it's just overwrought and overdirected. If there is a song that really needs the singer to stand and sing it, that's Cabaret (and Losing My Mind). There are many subtler ways to convey a breakdown than the three-act one-woman opera currently going on during the title number. Honestly, in the past few months I've seen so much stuff in London that was just too over-directed, and I don't know if it's because directors don't trust the material or simply think that the audience is a bunch of morons. "Cabaret" is a perfect showtune with a clearly delineated structure and evolution, you really do not need all that ACTING™️ to get the message through. Part of the problem is the staging in the round, which always forces actors to turn around every two seconds in the most unrealistic way. But seriously, just trust the material and tone it down a little. It has worked wonderfully for 55 years, just allow it to work its magic.
Also, I think Eddie Redmayne was good but also somehow underused? As in, in every scene he hides behind a different elaborate costume and make-up, and in this production the role of the Emcee doesn't need to rely on the performer's charisma as much as in other versions of the show (most notably Mendes'
. That's a pity, because atm Redmayne is very good, but hundreds of other actors could deliver pretty much the same performance.
It's a three and a half star production that could get much better, and I hope they'll do good use of all the previews. I have a ticket for next week and I'm tempted to return it and revisit it in a few months. But frankly I doubt much will change. The audience's reaction was indeed rapturous and the ovation after the title song really left me baffled (and again, I don't think it's Jessie Buckley's fault: she is a great actress, a great singer and her Maybe This Time is very touching). But tbh I think that if the audience comes and wants to see something brilliant they'll end up seeing something brilliant whether what they are actually seeing is good or not. If they expect it to be good, it will be good not matter what.
Updated On: 11/18/21 at 07:28 PM