I don't know how well it did, but there was a 2006 revival that was different from the Mendes. Though it clearly used it as the jumping off point. New set, new blocking, new costume designs, but different song orders and different arrangements. I don't know much else, but there was nudity. Then the 2012 revival in London was mounted by the same creative team as the 2006 one, but was apparently a wholly different production (designs, direction, etc); I also don't know how well this one did.
I remember reading in reviews that the 2006 revival pushed the show to it's darkest and most sexual boundary yet, and that the 2012 toned back the sexual stuff (I think the emcee costume went more Joel Grey than Alan Cumming) but kept it very dark.
The 2012 is probably the most original production the West End or Broadway has seen since the Mendes.
Updated On: 5/7/21 at 05:11 AM