which is worse: stinking like weed or texting in a theater? — Page 6
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:14pm
And writing etc. is a different issue because perhaps the weed provides inspiration or a new thought process. One doesn't need inspiration to enjoy a show.
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:15pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:15pm
If you truly enjoy the theatre, you should not need to post on a message board to discuss it with others to enhance your experience. Oh wait...
One doesn't need inspiration to enjoy a show.
Says who?
Wanting life but never knowing how
Updated On: 5/31/10 at 07:15 PM
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:19pm
eta: Bring it though, for your show and tell photos at intermission.
Updated On: 5/31/10 at 07:19 PM
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:23pm
Wait, let me arrange the semen glob in my hair just so.
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:34pm
And I think actors who are under the influence of something onstage are horrifically unprofessional. That goes without saying.
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:38pm
I think you'd be very disappointed in many, many actors, I'm afraid.
Borstal, you missed a spot - and ya wanna button your fly, please?
Posted: 5/31/10 at 7:47pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 8:08pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 8:09pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 8:30pm
After doing theatre for as long as I have, sitting in the audience takes extra effort without looking at the show with a critical eye.
Besides, bwaylvsong, weren't you the one who posted that the OP should seek help?
Give me a break.
Posted: 5/31/10 at 8:44pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 8:46pm
I echo ghostlight's thoughts about having no tolerance. If you don't object to audience members having a drink or two, you shouldn't object to someone who has smoked a little pot.
Honestly, unless it's really cold out or you've smoked an entire joint, I just don't think that the scent is going to be that that overpowering or will linger for that long. Honestly, if I'm ever anywhere and I smell the scent of weed, I chuckle. And yeah, I'm totally immature, but whatever. I think if more people smoked pot, the world would be a much nicer place.
Really, what this thread teaches us is whom among us has a pearl clutching overreaction to evils of marijuana and who doesn't.
Updated On: 5/31/10 at 08:46 PM
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:05pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:12pm
ETA
If you don't object to audience members having a drink or two, you shouldn't object to someone who has smoked a little pot.
Ain't that the truth, and frankly I'd rather risk having a pot head sitting next to me than a drunk. A drunk could get loud and rowdy whereas a pot head lacks the motivation to be disruptive.
Updated On: 5/31/10 at 09:12 PM
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:19pm
Joking? It sounds like you were apoplectic in your effort to try not to offend.
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:20pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:23pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:24pm
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:28pm
Nothing better than sitting next to someone who leaves my eys burning.
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:34pm
PRS, I'm almost done with college... and am probably one of a number of students I can count on my hands that hasn't tried any drugs.
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:43pm
There's a huge difference between someone smoking pot and people who do coke or smoke crack or shoot heroin. (although I don't think you'll see many junkies taking in a Broadway show. Not right after their fix, at least)
Updated On: 5/31/10 at 09:43 PM
Posted: 5/31/10 at 9:51pm
Wow, I'm really digging myself deeper and deeper in this thread... I should probably stop posting in it...
Posted: 5/31/10 at 10:04pm
Do a little research on pot and you'll see the BS reasons it's illegal. Without getting too 'history lesson' here...Back in the day hemp so threatened the major industries (cotton, paper, etc.) that the newspapers ran with stories like "eighty percent of all the murders committed by Mexicans are done while the killers are drugged by marijuana" and "A California man decapitated his best friend while under the spell of the smoke." Okay, that first one is crazy racist as well, but it still paints an accurate picture of the propaganda surrounding the demonetization of weed. Heck, just watching Reefer Madness (both the musical and the original anti-pot film) gives you an idea of how little truth there is to fears of weed. Though it may seem so far out there nowadays, people actually believed these claims and we're still feeling the repercussions even now.
I know we've gotten somewhat off-topic from the original post (which I already answered with 'cell phones' and a suggestion to cook the ganja into something ahead of time on a previous page), but I just think some people see the issue from such a limited place. The woman smoking a menthol before a show? No problem. The countless drinks being served beforehand (and at some shows - even at your seat)? That's fine. Yet someone asks if smoking weed before a show is ruder than something that we all can agree is an increasing problem in theaters nowadays and they get attacked. Guess which of the three hasn't killed anyone? Oh, that's right - the only one of the three that is illegal. Darn. I now shall step off my soap box. Apologies and such. :)
BroadwayWorld TV