Posted: 11/7/16 at 7:19pm
"No, but good job completely missing the point. I suppose that's par for the course.
I said the following "If Clinton wins, she will be the most disliked/most untrusted person ever elected POTUS". You replied back "Lincoln. While Lincoln was not liked or trusted, it was totally different reason. The main part of it was he was elected during the brink of a Civil War which is a big difference than somebody the majority of the country believes is a habitual liar and a decent percentage believe she is corrupt. Are you trying to say that Hillary and Lincoln were both disliked but both could become great Presidents? If so, sorry I don't think Hillary would be great.
One thing that still completely mystifies me are idiots who insist they want someone with zero political experience to be president. You would really trust and demand a brain surgeon to fix the economy? A car mechanic to fix your house's plumbing? A farmer to have authority over the military? Most policy-makers start in the House of Representatives for a reason; I certainly wouldn't want anyone with zero inkling of how the modern world's governments and economies work to be at the helm of the entire country. To want otherwise is naivete of the highest order.
These "idiots" probably want someone with zero political experience because they are so angry and disgusted with so many people with political experience. Just curious if you considered being a General political experience which is what Eisenhower had before becoming President. Personally, I think Governors have the best experience to be President because they bring to the table executive experience but they can be short of foreign policy experience.