The official announcement comes Monday.
Last week, Playbill.com ran an article with their guesses:
- TIME STANDS STILL by Donald Margulies
- CLYBOURNE PARK by Bruce Norris
- MIDDLETOWN by Will Eno
- THE SCOTTSBORO BOYS by Fred Ebb and John Kander
- THE ALIENS by Annie Baker
- RED by John Logan
- AFTER THE REVOLUTION by Amy Herzog
Any others you think might make it on the list?
SPIRIT CONTROL by Beau Willimon?
ME, MYSELF & I by Edward Albee?
HIGH by Matthew Lombardo?
No award this year?
I'm thinking the finalists will be:
Time Stands Still
The Scottsboro Boys
Red
I tend to think Red or Time Stands Still will win.
I know it's unlikely that a musical could win two years in a row, but I would love for "The Scottsboro Boys" to win. I think "Time Stands Still" will win, but would prefer to see "Scottsboro" or "Red" honored.
I would be shocked if Time Stands Still and Red weren't at least finalists. My guess is that the 3rd finalist will be After the Revolution or Clybourne Park (both of which I disliked but the critics loved). I am praying that Time Stands Still will win. I would be really bummed if Red won.
How many finalists are there each year? Only three? Does that include the recipient?
I will be thrilled if either SCOTTSBORO BOYS or TIME STANDS STILL wins. I found RED to be mundane.
A jury nominates up to three Finalists. Then the judges decide on a recipient, and can choose either one of the Finalists, one that is not a Finalist, or choose not to give the award at all.
Thanks for the info. So last year, the judges opted not to choose a finalist, but to go for Next to Normal instead, right?
Correct.
From the Pulitzer website:
- Nominated Finalists are selected by the Nominating Juries for each category as finalists in the competition. The Pulitzer Prize Board generally selects the Pulitzer Prize Winners from the three nominated finalists in each category. The names of nominated finalists have been announced only since 1980. Work that has been submitted for Prize consideration but not chosen as either a nominated finalist or a winner is termed an entry or submission. No information on entrants is provided.
- Since 1980, when we began to announce nominated finalists, we have used the term "nominee" for entrants who became finalists. We discourage someone saying he or she was "nominated" for a Pulitzer simply because an entry was sent to us.
- The Pulitzer Prize Board may elect to bestow No Award in a category in any given year.
- On rare occasions The Pulitzer Prize Board will award a Special Award or Citation to a work or an individual of particular merit.
I think Good People has a shot at a nom, but I'm really rooting for Scottsboro Boys!
Good People didn't premiere until this year, so it's not eligible until next year.
Given that several of the (at least nominees) in recent years have been left-field choices without New York productions, I'm not making any bets.
If I had to pick a New York show though, I would love to see it go to Clybourne Park.
^ Oh, you're right! It'll be interesting to see what they nominate, but I'd be shocked if Time Stands Still wasn't considered.
The Pulitzer Prize is an award as meaningless/meaningful as any other...one person's opinion is as good as anothers. So what if 20 or so people decided that Time Stands Still is the best drama of the year? I'm sure there are at least 20 people here who would give it to Scottsboro Boys, and their opinion is as valid to me as the Pulitzer Board's is. And do the same board decide all 21 of the awards? The Pulitzers just have pretensions to superiority, but really the whole thing is a load of crap.
Of the posters who've stated their hopes/predictions...were you really saying what you actually thought was the best, or just what is deemed "serious" enough to be considered?
That said, they're still fun!
Featured Actor Joined: 9/13/08
I'm all for Scottsboro or Time Stands Still this year. If After the Revolution gets nominated I'll be sad, because that I had such a hard time understanding how critics liked it...it's about a girl who has a bunch of different conversations with a bunch of different people about her grandfather...there's just about zero plot.
I'm not sure if hope has been given up yet, but if Scottsboro happens to win do you think that may give it the final push to coming back to the great white way?
I really hope Clybourne Park wins.
Kander and Ebb were never nominated for a Pulitzer before, were they?
What a lovely posthumous tribute that would be for Fred Ebb.
I'd be happy with either Time Stands Still or Scottsboro Boys winning. If I had to pick one though, I'd say TSS, if only because I saw it twice and love it both times.
I'd be thrilled if it went to Time Stands Still. I saw it in January and was blown away. Fantastic writing, direction, and performances from everyone involved.
I truly have a feeling its going to be SCOTTSBORO BOYS.
The Pulitzer committee already gave a prize to one of Margulies' "people-talking-about-having-emotions-instead-of-having-them" dramas.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/1/04
I think the Pulitzer committee will award Albee another prize before he dies, to make up for the Virginia Woolf debacle. So I think Me, Myself & I will be a finalist, if not the winner.
I hope it's not Time Stands Still. What a boring, lifeless play. There was nothing theatrical or interesting about it. It raised one interesting point, but had nothing else to offer.
I think Scottsboro Boys was brilliant. The staging was beautiful, the songs were great, and the format was interesting. I doubt it will win though.
I have a silly question: is this the kind of news that will break at midnight or just sometime during the day tomorrow?
Stand-by Joined: 4/13/08
It usually comes out at around 3pm.
I think it will be "Red".
It's a lot more interesting than "Time Stands Still" and Margulies already has a Pulitzer.
"Clybourne Park" strikes me as a real possibility as well.
Videos