CATSNYrevival said: "CT2NYC said: "A lot of actors have madevery successful careers out of basically playing themselves: Tom Cruise, Al Pacino, Sally Field, Denzel Washington, Morgan Freeman, Diane Keaton, Jack Nicholson. Julia Roberts, Will Smith, Brad Pitt, Johnny Depp, Tom Hanks, Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert DeNiro, Harrison Ford, George Clooney, Ryan Reynolds, Chris Pratt, and the list goes on. Most peopledon't like them fortheir range, but because there's a familiarity thattheir style of acting achieves, and people connect to that."
Oh good. Can we finally talk about how Leonardo DiCaprio's "acting" is just Leo being Leo with another bad accent?"
You are either belligerent or stubborn. Sure there are actors who are chameleons. I would site Meryl Streep, Glenn Close and Alec Guiness as obvious, Angela Lansbury in supporting roles, earlier Robert DeNiro and earlier Al Pacino (I say earlier to distinguish from the point at which they mainly worked on a lot of mediocre movies for a pay check).
However, there are many more excellent actors / major stars who have given many great performances, but who were still clearly themselves most of the time. In addition to the above, I would add John Wayne, James Stewart, Humphrey Bogart, Bette Davis, Claudette Colbert, Marilyn Monroe, Susan Hayward, Yul Brynner, Gregory Peck, Spencer Tracy, Gary Cooper, Greer Garson, Charlton Heston, Maggie Smith, Audrey Hepburn, etc., I would argue most of the all-time most revered actors. Same goes with some of the very famous movie character actors, e.g., Edward Arnold, Ed Begley, Charles Coburn, Arthur Kennedy, Gladys Cooper, etc., although I admit there may have been type-casting there.
Hell, I remember Katharine Hepburn once dissing Meryl Streep in a rare interview, citing that she relied too much on accents and mannerisms to distinguish roles. Hepburn was a great actress, but she was almost always Hepburn and when she wasn't, she sometimes bombed.
You will NEVER win this argument.