Itonlytakesajourney said: "Seahag has managed to write some of the most ridiculous arguments I have seen in my time on these boards. So... let me get this straight. The people that happen to be white, and who are against prejudice and racism and sexism and the like, are still racist and sexist and prejudiced? Utterly baffling. And before they start ranting about how white I am and that I don't get it, I am a poc, and many of us are not feeling your sentiment here. They are acting like there is only one type of abuse. Not everyone is a Jenna. Many people are Julie's. Also, to answer one of your questions, why should this be left in the past? If anything, Carousel is not promoting abuse and is bringing awareness to it. The hypocrisy in your statements is laughable."
Totally agree. Was trying to decide if Seahag is a second semester psych major (or maybe sociology), who is at the point where every new idea becomes emblazoned in his / her brain, and needs a target to use to illustrate what he / she has learned. (I am guessing that Seahag is a woman, since the term 'hag' usually refers derogatorily to a woman, but I don't want to make that assumption, for fear of being labeled a misogynist).
What she and everyone who thinks R&H are trivializing important issues, remember when these things were written. They were very advanced for the time in which they were produced. How many other movies or shows can you think of from the forties that target racism and / or abuse as a major focus. There weren't a lot, and most of them also stop far short of realism; but they were daring for their day.
PS -- Alternative theory -- I thought that Seahag might be a reincarnation of that annoying guy, Phillie can't remember his exact moniker, who made adamant statements all the time, most of which were ludicrous. He disappeared a year or so from this board.